Zoeller Robert F, Ryan Eric D, Gordish-Dressman Heather, Price Thomas B, Seip Richard L, Angelopoulos Theodore J, Moyna Niall M, Gordon Paul M, Thompson Paul D, Hoffman Eric P
Department of Exercise Science and Health Promotion, Florida Atlantic University, Davie, FL 33314, and Division of Cardiology, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, USA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Jun;39(6):1013-9. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3180423aad.
The purposes of this study were 1) derive allometric scaling models of isometric biceps muscle strength using pretraining body mass (BM) and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) as scaling variables in adult males, 2) test model appropriateness using regression diagnostics, and 3) cross-validate the models before and after 12 wk of resistance training.
A subset of FAMuSS (Functional SNP Associated with Muscle Size and Strength) study data (N=136) were randomly split into two groups (A and B). Allometric scaling models using pretraining BM and CSA were derived and tested for group A. The scaling exponents determined from these models were then applied to and tested on group B pretraining data. Finally, these scaling exponents were applied to and tested on group A and B posttraining data.
BM and CSA models produced scaling exponents of 0.64 and 0.71, respectively. Regression diagnostics determined both models to be appropriate. Cross-validation of the models to group B showed that the BM model, but not the CSA model, was appropriate. Removal of the largest six subjects (CSA>30 cm) from group B resulted in an appropriate fit for the CSA model. Application of the models to group A posttraining data showed that both models were appropriate, but only the body mass model was successful for group B.
These data suggest that the application of scaling exponents of 0.64 and 0.71, using BM and CSA, respectively, are appropriate for scaling isometric biceps strength in adult males. However, the scaling exponent using CSA may not be appropriate for individuals with biceps CSA>30 cm. Finally, 12 wk of resistance training does not alter the relationship between BM, CSA, and muscular strength as assessed by allometric scaling.
本研究的目的是:1)在成年男性中,使用训练前体重(BM)和肌肉横截面积(CSA)作为标度变量,推导等长二头肌力量的异速生长标度模型;2)使用回归诊断测试模型的适用性;3)在12周抗阻训练前后对模型进行交叉验证。
FAMuSS(与肌肉大小和力量相关的功能性单核苷酸多态性)研究数据的一个子集(N = 136)被随机分为两组(A组和B组)。使用训练前的BM和CSA推导并测试A组的异速生长标度模型。然后将从这些模型中确定的标度指数应用于B组训练前数据并进行测试。最后,将这些标度指数应用于A组和B组训练后数据并进行测试。
BM和CSA模型产生的标度指数分别为0.64和0.71。回归诊断确定这两个模型都是合适的。对B组进行模型交叉验证表明,BM模型合适,而CSA模型不合适。从B组中去除最大的6名受试者(CSA>30 cm)后,CSA模型拟合良好。将模型应用于A组训练后数据表明,两个模型都合适,但只有体重模型对B组成功。
这些数据表明,分别使用BM和CSA,标度指数为0.64和0.71,适用于标度成年男性的等长二头肌力量。然而,使用CSA的标度指数可能不适用于二头肌CSA>30 cm的个体。最后,12周的抗阻训练不会改变通过异速生长标度评估的BM、CSA和肌肉力量之间的关系。