• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于识别低风险肺栓塞患者的临床预后模型的验证

Validation of a clinical prognostic model to identify low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism.

作者信息

Aujesky D, Perrier A, Roy P-M, Stone R A, Cornuz J, Meyer G, Obrosky D S, Fine M J

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, University Outpatient Clinic, Clinical Epidemiology Center, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

J Intern Med. 2007 Jun;261(6):597-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01785.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01785.x
PMID:17547715
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To validate the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI), a clinical prognostic model which identifies low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism (PE).

DESIGN

Validation study using prospectively collected data.

SETTING

A total of 119 European hospitals.

SUBJECTS

A total of 899 patients diagnosed with PE.

INTERVENTION

The PESI uses 11 clinical factors to stratify patients with PE into five classes (I-V) of increasing risk of mortality. We calculated the PESI risk class for each patient and the proportion of patients classified as low-risk (classes I and II). The outcomes were overall and PE-specific mortality for low-risk patients at 3 months after presentation. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity and predictive values to predict overall and PE-specific mortality and the discriminatory power using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Overall and PE-specific mortality was 6.5% (58/899) and 2.3% (21/899) respectively. Forty-seven per cent of patients (426/899) were classified as low-risk. Low-risk patients had an overall mortality of only 1.2% (5/426) and a PE-specific mortality of 0.7% (3/426). The sensitivity was 91 [95% confidence interval (CI): 81-97%] and the negative predictive value was 99% (95% CI: 97-100%) for overall mortality. The sensitivity was 86% (95% CI: 64-97%) and the negative predictive value was 99% (95% CI: 98-100%) for PE-specific mortality. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve for overall and PE-specific mortality were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.75-0.86) and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.68-0.86) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This validation study confirms that the PESI reliably identifies low-risk patients with PE who are potential candidates for less costly outpatient treatment.

摘要

目的

验证肺栓塞严重程度指数(PESI),这是一种用于识别低风险肺栓塞(PE)患者的临床预后模型。

设计

使用前瞻性收集的数据进行验证研究。

地点

共119家欧洲医院。

研究对象

共899例诊断为PE的患者。

干预措施

PESI使用11个临床因素将PE患者分为死亡风险递增的五个类别(I - V)。我们计算了每位患者的PESI风险类别以及被归类为低风险(I类和II类)患者的比例。结局指标为就诊后3个月时低风险患者的全因死亡率和PE特异性死亡率。我们计算了预测全因死亡率和PE特异性死亡率的敏感性、特异性和预测值,并使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积计算鉴别力。

结果

全因死亡率和PE特异性死亡率分别为6.5%(58/899)和2.3%(21/899)。47%的患者(426/899)被归类为低风险。低风险患者的全因死亡率仅为1.2%(5/426),PE特异性死亡率为0.7%(3/426)。全因死亡率的敏感性为91%[95%置信区间(CI):81 - 97%],阴性预测值为99%(95%CI:97 - 100%)。PE特异性死亡率的敏感性为86%(95%CI:64 - 97%),阴性预测值为99%(95%CI:98 - 100%)。全因死亡率和PE特异性死亡率的受试者工作特征曲线下面积分别为0.80(95%CI:0.75 - 0.86)和0.77(95%CI:0.68 - 0.86)。

结论

这项验证研究证实,PESI能够可靠地识别出低风险的PE患者,这些患者有可能成为成本较低的门诊治疗的候选对象。

相似文献

1
Validation of a clinical prognostic model to identify low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism.用于识别低风险肺栓塞患者的临床预后模型的验证
J Intern Med. 2007 Jun;261(6):597-604. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01785.x.
2
Validation of a model to predict adverse outcomes in patients with pulmonary embolism.预测肺栓塞患者不良结局模型的验证
Eur Heart J. 2006 Feb;27(4):476-81. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehi588. Epub 2005 Oct 5.
3
A comparison of the original and simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index.原始简化肺栓塞严重指数比较。
Thromb Haemost. 2011 Sep;106(3):423-8. doi: 10.1160/TH11-04-0263. Epub 2011 Jun 28.
4
The inter-rater reliability of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index.肺栓塞严重指数的组内信度。
Thromb Haemost. 2010 Dec;104(6):1258-62. doi: 10.1160/TH10-07-0426. Epub 2010 Sep 13.
5
Simplification of the pulmonary embolism severity index for prognostication in patients with acute symptomatic pulmonary embolism.急性症状性肺栓塞患者预后评估中肺栓塞严重程度指数的简化
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Aug 9;170(15):1383-9. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.199.
6
Prospective validation of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index. A clinical prognostic model for pulmonary embolism.肺栓塞严重程度指数的前瞻性验证。一种肺栓塞的临床预后模型。
Thromb Haemost. 2008 Nov;100(5):943-8. doi: 10.1160/th08-05-0285.
7
[Comparative evaluation of prognostic scores in pulmonary embolism ].[肺栓塞预后评分的比较评估]
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 2012 Jan-Mar;116(1):69-74.
8
A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism.一种用于识别低风险肺栓塞患者的预测规则。
Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jan 23;166(2):169-75. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.2.169.
9
Comparing the pulmonary embolism severity index and the prognosis in pulmonary embolism scores as risk stratification tools.比较肺栓塞严重程度指数和肺栓塞评分中的预后情况作为风险分层工具。
J Hosp Med. 2012 Jan;7(1):22-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.932. Epub 2011 Oct 31.
10
LR-PED rule: low risk pulmonary embolism decision rule - a new decision score for low risk pulmonary embolism.LR-PED 规则:低危肺栓塞决策规则 - 一种用于低危肺栓塞的新决策评分。
Thromb Res. 2012 Sep;130(3):327-33. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.03.010. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of initial national early warning score with clinical deterioration in pulmonary embolism.初始国家早期预警评分与肺栓塞临床恶化的相关性
Thromb J. 2025 May 16;23(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12959-025-00735-7.
2
Low Stroke Volume Predicts Deterioration in Intermediate-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: Prospective Study.低心输出量预测中危肺栓塞恶化:前瞻性研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2024 Jul;25(4):533-547. doi: 10.5811/westjem.18434.
3
Validity of mortality risk prediction scores in critically ill patients with secondary pulmonary embolism.
重症继发性肺栓塞患者死亡率风险预测评分的有效性。
Biomol Biomed. 2024 Feb 28;24(4):990-997. doi: 10.17305/bb.2024.10202.
4
Efficacy of pulse oximetry for early diagnosis of pulmonary embolism after total knee arthroplasty.脉搏血氧饱和度测定法在全膝关节置换术后早期诊断肺栓塞中的有效性。
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2024 Jan 21;36(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s43019-023-00207-0.
5
A novel prognostic prediction indicator in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: Naples prognostic score.急性肺栓塞患者的一种新型预后预测指标:那不勒斯预后评分。
Thromb J. 2023 Nov 6;21(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12959-023-00554-8.
6
Bilateral Emboli and Highest Heart Rate Predict Hospitalization of Emergency Department Patients With Acute, Low-Risk Pulmonary Embolism.双侧栓塞和最高心率可预测急性低危肺栓塞急诊科患者的住院情况。
Ann Emerg Med. 2023 Sep;82(3):369-380. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2023.02.014. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
7
The Accuracy of Hestia and Simplified PESI to Predict the Prognosis in Pulmonary Embolism: Systematic Review with Meta-analysis.赫斯提亚和简化肺栓塞严重指数预测肺栓塞预后的准确性:一项Meta分析的系统评价
TH Open. 2022 Oct 23;6(4):e347-e353. doi: 10.1055/a-1942-2526. eCollection 2022 Oct.
8
Impact of clinical profile at admission on the outcomes in patients hospitalized for acute pulmonary embolism: data from the IPER Registry.入院时临床特征对急性肺栓塞住院患者结局的影响:来自 IPER 登记研究的数据。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2023 Jan;55(1):166-174. doi: 10.1007/s11239-022-02726-1. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
9
OUTPATIENT TREATMENT OF PULMONARY EMBOLISM - A SINGLE-CENTER EXPERIENCE.门诊治疗肺栓塞 - 单中心经验。
Acta Clin Croat. 2022 Jun;61(Suppl 1):38-43. doi: 10.20471/acc.2022.61.s1.06.
10
Emergency management of incidental pulmonary embolism (IPE).偶发性肺栓塞(IPE)的急诊处理
Emerg Cancer Care. 2022;1(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s44201-022-00004-7. Epub 2022 Jun 20.