Pyykönen T, Hänninen S, Mohaibes M, Sepponen J, Mononen J, Ahola L
University of Kuopio, Department of Biosciences, PO Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland.
Anim Reprod Sci. 2008 Jul;106(3-4):255-64. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2007.04.017. Epub 2007 May 3.
Social factors are known to affect the reproduction of many canids both in the wild and in farms. For example, reproduction in farmed silver foxes is regulated by social stress; foxes seem to benefit from noncramped housing conditions and permanent breeding cages. However, no comparable studies have been carried out in farmed blue foxes. The aim of our experiment was to create an alternative, improved, economically viable and practical housing solution for blue foxes. Therefore, we compared reproductive performance of blue foxes in permanent breeding cages with low animal densities (L group, N=79) and traditional housing with its changing social environment with high animal density (H group, N=74). The reproductive data from the L and H groups were compared separately for primiparous and multiparous vixens because the reproductive performance in primiparous vixens was substantially lower (P<0.001) than in multiparous vixens. Altogether, 41 and 39% of the primiparous vixens in the H and L group whelped (P>0.05), but only 28 and 34%, respectively, weaned at least one cub (P>0.05), i.e., 72 and 66% of the primiparous vixens did not reproduce in the H and L group, respectively (P>0.05). The total reproductive performance, expressed as cubs at weaning per breeding female, was 1.7+/-3.5 for the H and 1.6+/-2.9 for the L group (P>0.05). In the primiparous vixens, the only statistically significant difference observed between the two housing systems was that the onset of oestrus occurred five days earlier in the H than in the L group (P<0.05). All multiparous vixens in the L group exhibited oestrus compared to 94% in the H group (P>0.05). Furthermore, there was a nonsignificant (ns) trend for fewer barren females (9% versus 17%), more successfully reproducing vixens (83% versus 74%) and a higher number of live-born cubs (10.9+/-4.7 versus 9.4+/-3.9) in the L than in H group in the multiparous vixens (for all P>0.05). This resulted in 1.7 and 1.4 cubs more per breeding and per mated vixen, respectively, at weaning in the L group (7.3+/-5.0) compared to the H group (5.6+/-4.2), but also this difference was nonsignificant. Although our present results lack statistical significance, they are promising enough to encourage field experiments with sufficiently large number of animals to prove or disprove these preliminary findings that lower housing density and permanent breeding cage, together or separately, may enhance reproduction particularly in multiparous blue fox vixens.
已知社会因素会影响许多犬科动物在野外和养殖场的繁殖情况。例如,养殖银狐的繁殖受社会压力调节;狐狸似乎受益于宽敞的居住条件和永久性繁殖笼。然而,尚未对养殖蓝狐开展类似研究。我们实验的目的是为蓝狐创造一种替代的、改良的、经济可行且实用的居住解决方案。因此,我们比较了低动物密度的永久性繁殖笼中蓝狐(L组,N = 79)与高动物密度且社会环境不断变化的传统养殖方式中蓝狐(H组,N = 74)的繁殖性能。分别比较了初产雌狐和经产雌狐在L组和H组的繁殖数据,因为初产雌狐的繁殖性能显著低于经产雌狐(P < 0.001)。总体而言,H组和L组分别有41%和39%的初产雌狐产仔(P > 0.05),但分别只有28%和34%的初产雌狐至少断奶一只幼崽(P > 0.05),即H组和L组分别有72%和66%的初产雌狐未繁殖(P > 0.05)。以每只繁殖雌狐断奶时的幼崽数表示的总繁殖性能,H组为1.7±3.5,L组为1.6±2.9(P > 0.05)。在初产雌狐中,两种养殖系统之间观察到的唯一具有统计学意义的差异是,H组的发情开始时间比L组早五天(P < 0.05)。L组所有经产雌狐均发情,而H组为94%(P > 0.05)。此外,经产雌狐中,L组不育雌狐较少(9%对17%)、成功繁殖的雌狐较多(83%对74%)以及活产幼崽数量较多(10.9±4.7对9.4±3.9),但差异均无统计学意义(所有P > 0.05)。这导致L组(7.3±5.0)断奶时每只繁殖雌狐和每只交配雌狐分别比H组(5.6±4.2)多1.7只和1.4只幼崽,但该差异也无统计学意义。尽管我们目前的结果缺乏统计学意义,但它们很有前景,足以鼓励用足够数量的动物进行实地实验,以证实或反驳这些初步发现,即较低的养殖密度和永久性繁殖笼,单独或共同使用,可能会提高繁殖率,特别是在经产蓝狐雌狐中。