Charleston Jay S, Hansen Karl R, Thyer Angela C, Charleston Lynne B, Gougeon Alain, Siebert Joseph R, Soules Michael R, Klein Nancy A
Stereotome NW, Issaquah, WA 98027, USA.
Hum Reprod. 2007 Aug;22(8):2103-10. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dem137. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
BACKGROUND Previous published reports on the number of non-growing follicles (NGFs) in the human ovary have employed model-based methods for number estimates. These methods are time-intensive, and require correction factors and assumptions that ultimately limit their accuracy. Here, we describe the modification, application and validation of a modern fractionator/optical disector technique for the estimation of human ovarian NGF number. METHODS Forty-eight pairs of normal human ovaries were collected from women (age 8-51 years) undergoing elective bilateral oophorectomy, organ donation, or from autopsy. After gross pathologic examination, systematic random sampling was utilized to obtain tissue for analysis by the fractionator/optical disector method. The precision of individual NGF counts was determined by calculating the observed coefficient of error (OCE). Intra-observer variability and variation in NGF number between ovaries within a pair were also determined. RESULTS The mean OCE was 16.6% with larger variations observed at lower follicle counts. In recount experiments of the same ovary, NGF number estimates varied by 15-29%, except at very low follicle counts where variation was greater, but absolute differences were small. There was no significant difference in NGF number between ovaries within a pair (Wilcoxon signed rank test, P = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS Modern stereology methods provide an unbiased, efficient method for estimating NGF number in the human ovary. Both ovaries within a pair contain similar numbers of NGFs.
背景 先前发表的关于人类卵巢中不生长卵泡(NGF)数量的报告采用了基于模型的方法进行数量估计。这些方法耗时且需要校正因子和假设,最终限制了其准确性。在此,我们描述了一种现代的分馏器/光学分割器技术在估计人类卵巢NGF数量方面的改进、应用和验证。
方法 从接受择期双侧卵巢切除术、器官捐赠的女性(年龄8 - 51岁)或尸检中收集48对正常人类卵巢。经过大体病理检查后,采用系统随机抽样获取组织,通过分馏器/光学分割器方法进行分析。通过计算观察到的误差系数(OCE)来确定单个NGF计数的精度。还确定了同一观察者内的变异性以及一对卵巢内NGF数量的变异性。
结果 平均OCE为16.6%,在较低卵泡计数时观察到较大的变异性。在同一卵巢的重新计数实验中,NGF数量估计值相差15 - 29%,除了在非常低的卵泡计数时变异性更大,但绝对差异较小。一对卵巢内的NGF数量没有显著差异(Wilcoxon符号秩检验,P = 0.81)。
结论 现代体视学方法为估计人类卵巢中的NGF数量提供了一种无偏且有效的方法。一对卵巢中的两个卵巢含有相似数量的NGF。