Horwitz Leora I, Kosiborod Mikhail, Lin Zhenqiu, Krumholz Harlan M
Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, and Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8088, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jul 17;147(2):97-103. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-2-200707170-00163. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
Limits on resident work hours are intended to reduce fatigue-related errors, but may raise risk by increasing transfers of responsibility for patients.
To examine changes in outcomes for internal medicine patients after the implementation of work-hour regulations.
Retrospective cohort study.
Urban, academic medical center.
14,260 consecutive patients discharged from the teaching (housestaff) service and 6664 consecutive patients discharged from the nonteaching (hospitalist) service between 1 July 2002 and 30 June 2004.
Outcomes included intensive care unit utilization, length of stay, discharge disposition, 30-day readmission rate to the study institution, pharmacist interventions to prevent error, drug-drug interactions and in-hospital death.
The teaching service had net improvements in 3 outcomes. Relative to changes experienced by the nonteaching service, the rate of intensive care unit utilization decreased by 2.1% (95% CI, -3.3% to -0.7%; P = 0.002), the rate of discharge to home or rehabilitation facility versus elsewhere improved by 5.3% (CI, 2.6% to 7.6%; P < 0.001), and pharmacist interventions to prevent error were reduced by 1.92 interventions per 100 patient-days (CI, -2.74 to -1.03 interventions per 100 patient-days; P < 0.001). Teaching and nonteaching services had similar changes over time in length of stay, 30-day readmission rate, and adverse drug-drug interactions. In-hospital death was uncommon in both groups, and change over time was similar in the 2 groups.
The study was a retrospective, nonrandomized design that assessed a limited number of outcomes. Teaching and nonteaching cohorts may not have been affected similarly by secular trends in patient care.
After the implementation of work-hour regulations, 3 of 7 outcomes improved for patients in the teaching service relative to those in the nonteaching service. The authors found no evidence of adverse unintended consequences after the institution of work-hour regulations.
对住院医师工作时长进行限制旨在减少与疲劳相关的失误,但可能会因增加患者责任交接而提高风险。
研究工作时长规定实施后内科患者的治疗结果变化。
回顾性队列研究。
城市学术医疗中心。
2002年7月1日至2004年6月30日期间,教学(住院医师)服务团队连续收治的14260例出院患者,以及非教学(医院医师)服务团队连续收治的6664例出院患者。
结果包括重症监护病房使用率、住院时长、出院处置方式、30天内返回研究机构的再入院率、药师为预防失误采取的干预措施、药物相互作用及院内死亡情况。
教学服务团队在3项结果上有净改善。与非教学服务团队的变化相比,重症监护病房使用率降低了2.1%(95%置信区间,-3.3%至-0.7%;P = 0.002),出院回家或康复机构而非其他地方的比例提高了5.3%(置信区间,2.6%至7.6%;P < 0.001),药师预防失误的干预措施每100患者日减少了1.92次(置信区间,每100患者日-2.74至-1.03次;P < 0.001)。教学服务团队和非教学服务团队在住院时长、30天再入院率及不良药物相互作用方面随时间的变化相似。两组院内死亡情况均不常见,且两组随时间的变化相似。
本研究为回顾性非随机设计,评估的结果数量有限。教学服务团队和非教学服务团队可能未受到患者护理长期趋势的类似影响。
工作时长规定实施后,教学服务团队的患者在7项结果中的3项上相对于非教学服务团队的患者有所改善。作者未发现工作时长规定实施后出现不良意外后果的证据。