• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[动态触诊]

[Motion palpation].

作者信息

Marcotte Justin

机构信息

Département de chiropratique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2005 Sep;49(3):210-5.

PMID:17549135
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1839905/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Motion palpation has been used as a diagnostic tool for vertebral subluxation, even though its reliability is questionable. Standardisation of palpation has proven substantially more reliable. A scale of assessment of a standardized palpation has not yet been tested for reliability.

OBJECTIVE

The measure of intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability of a scale of assessment for the standardized palpation of cervical rotation.

DESIGN

Intraexaminer study: Twelve chiropractic students were assessed by a blindfolded experienced clinician. Interexaminer study: Twelve regular patients with a history of neck problem were assessed by two chiropractors in a clinical setting.

RESULTS

Data analysis shows fair to strong reliability (k = 0.34 and 0.65) for the scale of assessment that was used. The results are comparable to other assessment scales used currently in practice.

CONCLUSION

The utilisation of a scale of assessment for standardised motion palpation may prove a useful clinical tool, as other common testing measures (tendon reflex, muscle tone, muscle strength) which use similar scale of assessment.

摘要

背景

尽管运动触诊的可靠性存疑,但它一直被用作脊椎半脱位的诊断工具。事实证明,触诊标准化要可靠得多。标准化触诊的评估量表尚未进行可靠性测试。

目的

评估颈椎旋转标准化触诊评估量表在检查者内和检查者间的可靠性。

设计

检查者内研究:由一位蒙眼的经验丰富的临床医生对12名脊椎按摩专业学生进行评估。检查者间研究:在临床环境中,由两位脊椎按摩师对12名有颈部问题病史的普通患者进行评估。

结果

数据分析表明,所使用的评估量表具有中等至较强的可靠性(kappa值分别为0.34和0.65)。结果与目前实践中使用的其他评估量表相当。

结论

标准化运动触诊评估量表的使用可能是一种有用的临床工具,因为其他常见的测试方法(肌腱反射、肌张力、肌肉力量)使用类似的评估量表。

相似文献

1
[Motion palpation].[动态触诊]
J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2005 Sep;49(3):210-5.
2
Reliability of chiropractic methods commonly used to detect manipulable lesions in patients with chronic low-back pain.常用于检测慢性下腰痛患者可手法治疗损伤的整脊疗法的可靠性。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 May;23(4):231-8. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2000.106101.
3
Preliminary study of the reliability of assessment procedures for indications for chiropractic adjustments of the lumbar spine.腰椎整脊适应症评估程序可靠性的初步研究
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1999 Jul-Aug;22(6):382-9. doi: 10.1016/s0161-4754(99)70083-7.
4
Interexaminer reliability of palpation for cervical spine tenderness.颈椎压痛触诊的检查者间可靠性。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1994 Nov-Dec;17(9):591-5.
5
Reliability of motion palpation procedures to detect sacroiliac joint fixations.用于检测骶髂关节固定的手法触诊程序的可靠性。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1989 Apr;12(2):86-92.
6
Interexaminer reliability of chiropractic evaluation for cervical spine problems--a pilot study. Part 1: Graduates from one institution.脊椎按摩疗法对颈椎问题评估的检查者间可靠性——一项试点研究。第1部分:来自同一机构的毕业生。
Australas Chiropr Osteopathy. 1996 Mar;5(1):23-9.
7
The role of experience in clinical accuracy.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1990 Feb;13(2):68-71.
8
Are chiropractic tests for the lumbo-pelvic spine reliable and valid? A systematic critical literature review.针对腰骶椎的整脊测试是否可靠且有效?一项系统的批判性文献综述。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2000 May;23(4):258-75. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2000.106097.
9
Most commonly used methods of detecting spinal subluxation and the preferred term for its description: a survey of chiropractors in Victoria, Australia.检测脊柱半脱位的最常用方法及其描述的首选术语:对澳大利亚维多利亚州脊椎按摩师的一项调查
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997 Nov-Dec;20(9):583-9.
10
Interexaminer reliability of eight evaluative dimensions of lumbar segmental abnormality: Part II.腰椎节段异常八个评估维度的检查者间可靠性:第二部分。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1993 Jul-Aug;16(6):363-74.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability of clinical tests in the assessment of patients with neck/shoulder problems-impact of history.颈部/肩部问题患者评估中临床检查的可靠性——病史的影响
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 1;28(19):2222-31. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000089685.55629.2E.
2
The kinematics of motion palpation and its effect on the reliability for cervical spine rotation.运动触诊的运动学及其对颈椎旋转可靠性的影响。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2002 Sep;25(7):E7. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2002.126472.
3
Inter-examiner reliability in assessing passive intervertebral motion of the cervical spine.评估颈椎被动椎间运动时检查者间的可靠性。
Man Ther. 2000 May;5(2):97-101. doi: 10.1054/math.2000.0234.
4
The relationships between spinal sagittal configuration, joint mobility, general low back mobility and segmental mobility in female homecare personnel.女性家庭护理人员的脊柱矢状面形态、关节活动度、总体腰椎活动度和节段性活动度之间的关系。
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1999 Dec;31(4):197-206. doi: 10.1080/003655099444362.
5
Mayo and NINDS scales for assessment of tendon reflexes: between observer agreement and implications for communication.用于评估腱反射的梅奥和美国国立神经疾病与中风研究所量表:观察者间一致性及其对沟通的影响
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998 Feb;64(2):253-5. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.64.2.253.
6
How real is the subluxation?半脱位有多真实?
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1997 Sep;20(7):482-7.
7
Interexaminer reliability in physical examination of patients with low back pain.腰痛患者体格检查中的检查者间可靠性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Apr 1;22(7):814-20. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199704010-00021.
8
Interexaminer reliability of palpation for cervical spine tenderness.颈椎压痛触诊的检查者间可靠性。
J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1994 Nov-Dec;17(9):591-5.
9
Reliability in evaluating passive intervertebral motion.评估被动椎间运动的可靠性。
Phys Ther. 1982 Apr;62(4):436-44. doi: 10.1093/ptj/62.4.436.
10
Interexaminer reliability studies: spanning a gap in medical research--Louisa Burns Memorial Lecture.考官间可靠性研究:弥合医学研究中的差距——路易莎·伯恩斯纪念讲座
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1982 Aug;81(12):819-29.