• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人工耳蜗植入后的儿童发育(CDaCI)研究:设计与基线特征

Childhood Development after Cochlear Implantation (CDaCI) study: design and baseline characteristics.

作者信息

Fink Nancy E, Wang Nae-Yuh, Visaya Jiovani, Niparko John K, Quittner Alexandra, Eisenberg Laurie S, Tobey Emily A

机构信息

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

出版信息

Cochlear Implants Int. 2007 Jun;8(2):92-116. doi: 10.1179/cim.2007.8.2.92.

DOI:10.1179/cim.2007.8.2.92
PMID:17549807
Abstract

Children with severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss face communication challenges that influence language, psychosocial and scholastic performance. Clinical studies over the past 20 years have supported wider application of cochlear implants in children. The Childhood Development after Cochlear Implantation (CDaCI) study is the first longitudinal multicentre, national cohort study to evaluate systematically early cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in children. The objective of the study was to compare children who have undergone cochlear implantation, with similarly aged hearing peers across multiple domains, including oral language development, auditory performance, psychosocial and behavioural functioning, and quality of life. The CDaCI study is a multicentre national cohort study of CI children and normal hearing (NH) peers. Eligibility criteria include informed consent, age less than 5 years, pre- or post-lingually deaf, developmental criteria met, commitment to educate the child in English and bilateral cochlear implants. All children had a standardised baseline assessment that included demographics, hearing and medical history, communication history, language measures, cognitive tests, speech recognition, an audiological exam, psychosocial assessment including parent-child videotapes and parent reported quality of life. Follow-up visits are scheduled at six-month intervals and include a standardised assessment of the full battery of measures. Quality assurance activities were incorporated into the design of the study. A total of 188 CI children and 97 NH peers were enrolled between November 2002 and December 2004. The mean age, gender and race of the CI and NH children are comparable. With regard to parental demographics, the CI and NH children's families are statistically different. The parents of CI children are younger, and not as well educated, with 49% of CI parents reporting college graduation vs. 84% of the NH parents. The income of the CI parents is also lower than the NH parents. Assessments of cognition suggest that there may be baseline differences between the CI and NH children; however the scores were high enough to suggest language learning potential. The observed group differences identified these baseline characteristics as potential confounders which may require adjustment in analyses of outcomes. This longitudinal cohort study addresses questions related to high variability in language outcomes. Identifying sources of that variance requires research designs that: characterise potential predictors with accuracy, use samples that adequately power a study, and employ controls and approaches to analysis that limit bias and error. The CDaCI study was designed to generate a more complete picture of the interactive processes of language learning after implantation.

摘要

患有重度至极重度感音神经性听力损失的儿童面临着影响语言、心理社会和学业表现的沟通挑战。过去20年的临床研究支持了人工耳蜗在儿童中的更广泛应用。人工耳蜗植入后的儿童发育(CDaCI)研究是第一项纵向多中心全国队列研究,旨在系统评估儿童早期人工耳蜗植入(CI)的效果。该研究的目的是在多个领域比较接受人工耳蜗植入的儿童与年龄相仿的听力正常同龄人,这些领域包括口语语言发展、听觉表现、心理社会和行为功能以及生活质量。CDaCI研究是一项针对人工耳蜗植入儿童和听力正常(NH)同龄人的多中心全国队列研究。入选标准包括知情同意、年龄小于5岁、语前或语后失聪、符合发育标准、承诺用英语教育孩子以及双侧人工耳蜗植入。所有儿童都进行了标准化的基线评估,包括人口统计学、听力和病史、沟通史、语言测量、认知测试、言语识别、听力检查、心理社会评估(包括亲子录像带)以及家长报告的生活质量。随访安排在每隔六个月进行一次,包括对所有测量指标的标准化评估。质量保证活动被纳入研究设计中。在2002年11月至2004年12月期间,共招募了188名人工耳蜗植入儿童和97名听力正常同龄人。人工耳蜗植入儿童和听力正常儿童的平均年龄、性别和种族具有可比性。在父母人口统计学方面,人工耳蜗植入儿童和听力正常儿童的家庭在统计学上存在差异。人工耳蜗植入儿童的父母更年轻,受教育程度也较低,49%的人工耳蜗植入儿童父母报告大学毕业,而听力正常儿童父母的这一比例为84%。人工耳蜗植入儿童父母的收入也低于听力正常儿童的父母。认知评估表明,人工耳蜗植入儿童和听力正常儿童之间可能存在基线差异;然而,分数足够高,表明有语言学习潜力。观察到的组间差异将这些基线特征确定为潜在的混杂因素,可能需要在结果分析中进行调整。这项纵向队列研究解决了与语言结果高度变异性相关的问题。确定这种变异性的来源需要研究设计做到:准确描述潜在预测因素、使用足够强大样本量的样本,并采用限制偏差和误差的对照和分析方法。CDaCI研究旨在更全面地了解植入后语言学习的交互过程。

相似文献

1
Childhood Development after Cochlear Implantation (CDaCI) study: design and baseline characteristics.人工耳蜗植入后的儿童发育(CDaCI)研究:设计与基线特征
Cochlear Implants Int. 2007 Jun;8(2):92-116. doi: 10.1179/cim.2007.8.2.92.
2
Cochlear Implantation and Educational and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Adolescence.人工耳蜗植入与青少年的教育和生活质量结果。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Aug 1;149(8):708-715. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.1327.
3
Impact of socioeconomic factors on paediatric cochlear implant outcomes.社会经济因素对儿童人工耳蜗植入效果的影响。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Nov;102:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
4
Speech and language outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with isolated auditory neuropathy versus cochlear hearing loss.孤立性听觉神经病变与耳蜗性听力损失患儿人工耳蜗植入术后的言语和语言结局。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Dec;34(9):1615-21. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182a1ab5b.
5
Psychomotor development of 4-year-old deaf children with cochlear implants: Three case studies.聋童人工耳蜗植入后的运动与心理发展:三例个案研究。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Feb;141:110570. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110570. Epub 2020 Dec 16.
6
Early prelingual auditory development and speech perception at 1-year follow-up in Mandarin-speaking children after cochlear implantation.普通话儿童人工耳蜗植入术后1年随访时的早期语前听觉发育及言语感知
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Nov;75(11):1418-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Sep 3.
7
Timing of cochlear implantation and parents' global ratings of children's health and development.人工耳蜗植入的时机与父母对儿童健康和发展的总体评价。
Otol Neurotol. 2012 Jun;33(4):545-52. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182522906.
8
Predictors of spoken language development following pediatric cochlear implantation.儿童人工耳蜗植入后口语发展的预测因素。
Ear Hear. 2012 Sep-Oct;33(5):617-39. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182503e47.
9
Outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with isolated auditory neuropathy versus cochlear hearing loss.孤立性听神经病患儿与耳蜗性聋患儿人工耳蜗植入的效果比较。
Otol Neurotol. 2013 Apr;34(3):477-83. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3182877741.
10
American parent perspectives on quality of life in pediatric cochlear implant recipients.美国父母对小儿人工耳蜗植入受者生活质量的看法。
Ear Hear. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2):269-78. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000108.

引用本文的文献

1
Teenagers and Young Adults with Cochlear Implants: A Multidisciplinary Follow-Up Study Approach and Baseline Characteristics.青少年及青年人工耳蜗植入者:一项多学科随访研究方法及基线特征
Audiol Res. 2025 Feb 12;15(1):16. doi: 10.3390/audiolres15010016.
2
Establishment of quantitative evaluation system for cochlear implant effectiveness for hearing-impaired children.建立听力障碍儿童人工耳蜗植入效果的定量评估体系。
J Otol. 2024 Apr;19(2):77-84. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
3
Vocabulary Composition Shapes Language Development in Children With Cochlear Implants.
词汇构成影响植入人工耳蜗儿童的语言发展。
Dev Sci. 2025 Jan;28(1):e13588. doi: 10.1111/desc.13588.
4
Does Childhood Cochlear Implantation Spill Over to Carers' Employment Status?儿童期人工耳蜗植入是否会影响照顾者的就业状况?
Ear Hear. 2025;46(2):277-285. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001588. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
5
Outcomes of Aural Rehabilitation Provided in Person or by Telehealth Among Deaf/Hard of Hearing Young Children with Cochlear Implants or Hearing Aids.人工或远程医疗提供的助听康复服务对植入人工耳蜗或佩戴助听器的聋/重听幼儿的影响。
Telemed J E Health. 2024 Oct;30(10):2608-2619. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0634. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
6
Reliability and validity assessment of a survey: Measuring satisfaction with cochlear implant rehabilitation services for children in Jordan.调查的信度和效度评估:测量约旦儿童对人工耳蜗康复服务的满意度。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 18;18(12):e0295939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295939. eCollection 2023.
7
Cataloging Existing Hearing Loss Cohort Data to Guide the Development of Precision Medicine for Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review of Hearing Repositories.对现有的听力损失队列数据进行编目,以指导感音神经性听力损失的精准医学发展:听力存储库的系统评价。
J Int Adv Otol. 2023 Oct;19(5):420-425. doi: 10.5152/iao.2023.22690.
8
Comparing Scores on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test and Receptive One-Word Picture Vocabulary Test in Preschoolers With and Without Hearing Loss.比较有听力损失和无听力损失学龄前儿童在 Peabody 图片词汇测试和接受性单字图片词汇测试上的得分。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Jul 10;32(4):1610-1619. doi: 10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00352. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
9
Predictors of Time Spent in Special Education Among Students With Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.重度至极重度听力损失学生接受特殊教育时间的预测因素。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Aug;169(2):243-252. doi: 10.1002/ohn.301. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
10
Deaf Children Need Rich Language Input from the Start: Support in Advising Parents.聋儿从一开始就需要丰富的语言输入:为家长提供建议方面的支持。
Children (Basel). 2022 Oct 22;9(11):1609. doi: 10.3390/children9111609.