Rix Thomas E, Bates Tom
Department of General Surgery, Eastbourne District General Hospital, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN21 2UD, UK.
World J Emerg Surg. 2007 Jun 5;2:16. doi: 10.1186/1749-7922-2-16.
The decision on whether to operate on a sick elderly person with an intra-abdominal emergency is one of the most difficult in general surgery. A predictive risk-score would be of great value in this situation.
A Medline search was performed to identify those predictive risk-scores relevant to sick elderly patients in whom emergency surgery might be life-saving.
Many of the risk scores for surgical patients include the operative findings or require tests which are not available in the acute situation. Most of the relevant studies include younger patients and elective surgery. The Glasgow Aneurysm Score and Hardman Index are specific to ruptured aortic aneurysm while the Boey Score and the Hacetteppe Score are specific to perforated peptic ulcer. The Reiss Index and Fitness Score can be used pre-operatively if the elements of the score can be completed in time. The ASA score, which includes a significant element of subjective clinical judgement, can be augmented with factors such as age and urgency of surgery but no test has a negative predictive value sufficient to recommend against surgical intervention without clinical input.
Risk scores may be helpful in sick elderly patients needing emergency abdominal surgery but an experienced clinical opinion is still essential.
对于患有腹部急症的老年患者是否进行手术,是普通外科中最困难的决策之一。在这种情况下,一个预测风险评分将具有很大价值。
进行了一项医学文献数据库(Medline)检索,以确定那些与可能需要急诊手术以挽救生命的老年患者相关的预测风险评分。
许多针对手术患者的风险评分包含手术发现或需要在急性情况下无法进行的检查。大多数相关研究纳入的是较年轻患者和择期手术。格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分和哈德曼指数专门针对破裂性主动脉瘤,而博伊评分和哈杰泰普评分专门针对穿孔性消化性溃疡。如果能及时完成评分要素,里斯指数和健康评分可在术前使用。美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分包含重要的主观临床判断要素,可通过年龄和手术紧急程度等因素进行补充,但没有任何检查具有足够的阴性预测价值,能够在没有临床评估的情况下建议不进行手术干预。
风险评分可能有助于需要急诊腹部手术的老年患者,但经验丰富的临床意见仍然至关重要。