Scholz Urte, Schüz Benjamin, Ziegelmann Jochen P, Lippke Sonia, Schwarzer Ralf
Department of Psychology, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Br J Health Psychol. 2008 Sep;13(Pt 3):479-94. doi: 10.1348/135910707X216062. Epub 2007 Jun 2.
Health-behaviour change is not predicted well by behavioural intentions alone. Action planning and coping planning are two self-regulatory strategies that may help bridge the gap between intentions and behaviour. Action planning comprises the when, where and how of implementing a behaviour. Coping planning involves the anticipation of barriers and ways to overcome them. The study examines whether the inclusion of these two planning constructs would improve the overall prediction of physical activity. The main research question is which kind of planning would be beneficial for the initiation of behaviour and which one for its maintenance. Moreover, it is examined whether intentions moderate the planning-behaviour relationship.
A 5-week longitudinal on-line study was conducted with 354 participants. Differences in prediction patterns between formerly active and formerly inactive individuals were compared using multigroup structural equation modelling. Moderating effects of intentions were tested by means of latent interactions.
Inclusion of the two planning factors accounted for substantially more behaviour variance than intention alone did. Coping planning mediated the intention-behaviour relationship only in formerly active, but not in formerly inactive participants. Moreover, intentions moderated the effects of both types of planning on behaviour.
Action planning appears to predict behaviour only when intentions are high. For actors, coping planning represents a critical self-regulation strategy to maintain their physical activity levels.
仅靠行为意图并不能很好地预测健康行为的改变。行动计划和应对计划是两种自我调节策略,可能有助于弥合意图与行为之间的差距。行动计划包括实施行为的时间、地点和方式。应对计划涉及对障碍及其克服方法的预期。本研究考察纳入这两种计划结构是否会改善对身体活动的整体预测。主要研究问题是哪种计划对行为的启动有益,哪种对行为的维持有益。此外,还考察了意图是否会调节计划与行为之间的关系。
对354名参与者进行了一项为期5周的纵向在线研究。使用多组结构方程模型比较了曾经活跃和曾经不活跃个体之间预测模式的差异。通过潜在交互作用检验意图的调节作用。
纳入两个计划因素比仅靠意图能解释更多的行为差异。应对计划仅在曾经活跃的参与者中中介了意图与行为的关系,而在曾经不活跃的参与者中没有。此外,意图调节了两种计划对行为的影响。
行动计划似乎仅在意图较高时才能预测行为。对于行动者而言,应对计划是维持其身体活动水平的关键自我调节策略。