Kaler Gregory, Truong David M, Khandelwal Akash, Nagle Megha, Eraly Satish A, Swaan Peter W, Nigam Sanjay K
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA.
J Biol Chem. 2007 Aug 17;282(33):23841-53. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703467200. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
Organic anion transporters (OATs, SLC22) interact with a remarkably diverse array of endogenous and exogenous organic anions. However, little is known about the structural features that determine their substrate selectivity. We examined the substrate binding preferences and transport function of olfactory organic anion transporter, Oat6, in comparison with the more broadly expressed transporter, Oat1 (first identified as NKT). In analyzing interactions of both transporters with over 40 structurally diverse organic anions, we find a correlation between organic anion potency (pKi) and hydrophobicity (logP) suggesting a hydrophobicity-driven association with transporter-binding sites, which appears particularly prominent for Oat6. On the other hand, organic anion binding selectivity between Oat6 and Oat1 is influenced by the anion mass and net charge. Smaller mono-anions manifest greater potency for Oat6 and di-anions for Oat1. Comparative molecular field analysis confirms these mechanistic insights and provides a model for predicting new OAT substrates. By comparative molecular field analysis, both hydrophobic and charged interactions contribute to Oat1 binding, although it is predominantly the former that contributes to Oat6 binding. Together, the data suggest that, although the three-dimensional structures of these two transporters may be very similar, the binding pockets exhibit crucial differences. Furthermore, for six radiolabeled substrates, we assessed transport efficacy (Vmax) for Oat6 and Oat1. Binding potency and transport efficacy had little correlation, suggesting that different molecular interactions are involved in substrate binding to the transporter and translocation across the membrane. Substrate specificity for a particular transporter may enable design of drugs for targeting to specific tissues (e.g. olfactory mucosa). We also discuss how these data suggest a possible mechanism for remote sensing between OATs in different tissue compartments (e.g. kidney, olfactory mucosa) via organic anions.
有机阴离子转运体(OATs,SLC22)可与种类繁多的内源性和外源性有机阴离子相互作用。然而,关于决定其底物选择性的结构特征,我们却知之甚少。我们研究了嗅觉有机阴离子转运体Oat6与表达更为广泛的转运体Oat1(最初被鉴定为NKT)相比的底物结合偏好和转运功能。在分析这两种转运体与40多种结构各异的有机阴离子的相互作用时,我们发现有机阴离子效力(pKi)与疏水性(logP)之间存在相关性,这表明疏水性驱动了与转运体结合位点的关联,这种现象在Oat6中尤为突出。另一方面,Oat6和Oat1之间的有机阴离子结合选择性受阴离子质量和净电荷的影响。较小的单阴离子对Oat6表现出更高的效力,而双阴离子对Oat1表现出更高的效力。比较分子场分析证实了这些机制见解,并提供了一个预测新的OAT底物的模型。通过比较分子场分析,疏水性和带电相互作用都对Oat1的结合有贡献,尽管主要是前者对Oat6的结合有贡献。总之,数据表明,尽管这两种转运体的三维结构可能非常相似,但结合口袋存在关键差异。此外,对于六种放射性标记底物,我们评估了Oat6和Oat1的转运效率(Vmax)。结合效力和转运效率几乎没有相关性,这表明底物与转运体结合以及跨膜转运涉及不同的分子相互作用。特定转运体的底物特异性可能有助于设计靶向特定组织(如嗅觉黏膜)的药物。我们还讨论了这些数据如何暗示了不同组织区室(如肾脏、嗅觉黏膜)中的OATs之间通过有机阴离子进行遥感的可能机制。