Hasler Gregor, Fromm Stephen, Alvarez Ruben P, Luckenbaugh David A, Drevets Wayne C, Grillon Christian
Psychiatric University Hospital, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
J Neurosci. 2007 Jun 6;27(23):6313-9. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5369-06.2007.
The goal of this study was to compare cerebral blood flow (CBF) changes associated with phasic cued fear versus those associated with sustained contextual anxiety. Positron emission tomography images of CBF were acquired using [O-15]H2O in 17 healthy human subjects as they anticipated unpleasant electric shocks that were administered predictably (signaled by a visual cue) or unpredictably (threatened by the context). Presentation of the cue in either threat condition was associated with increased CBF in the left amygdala. A cue that specifically predicted the shock was associated with CBF increases in the ventral prefrontal cortex (PFC), hypothalamus, anterior cingulate cortex, left insula, and bilateral putamen. The sustained threat context increased CBF in the right hippocampus, mid-cingulate gyrus, subgenual PFC, midbrain periaqueductal gray, thalamus, bilateral ventral striatum, and parieto-occipital cortex. This study showed distinct neuronal networks involved in cued fear and contextual anxiety underlying the importance of this distinction for studies on the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders.
本研究的目的是比较与阶段性线索性恐惧相关的脑血流量(CBF)变化和与持续性情境性焦虑相关的CBF变化。在17名健康人类受试者预期会接受可预测(由视觉线索信号提示)或不可预测(由情境威胁)的不愉快电击时,使用[O-15]H2O获取CBF的正电子发射断层扫描图像。在两种威胁条件下,线索的呈现均与左侧杏仁核CBF增加有关。专门预测电击的线索与腹侧前额叶皮质(PFC)、下丘脑、前扣带回皮质、左侧岛叶和双侧壳核的CBF增加有关。持续性威胁情境使右侧海马体、中扣带回、膝下PFC、中脑导水管周围灰质、丘脑、双侧腹侧纹状体和顶枕叶皮质的CBF增加。这项研究表明,线索性恐惧和情境性焦虑涉及不同的神经元网络,这一区别对于焦虑症病理生理学研究具有重要意义。