Wijnen E, van der Sande F M, Kooman J P, de Graaf T, Tordoir J H M, Leunissen K M L, Schneditz D
Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, University Hospital Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Kidney Int. 2007 Sep;72(6):736-41. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002376. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
A reduction in vascular access flow poses a risk for thrombosis. We present a new technique to measure vascular access flow during dialysis based on extracorporeal temperature gradients, and their changes, on reversing the extracorporeal bloodlines without having to inject an indicator. Fistula temperatures were measured by the blood temperature monitor with normal line position and after manual switching of the bloodlines using the same extracorporeal blood flow. The access flow by our temperature gradient method (TGM) was compared to access flow derived by saline dilution with measurements in the same patients repeated in subsequent weeks. In 70 pairs of TGM and saline dilution measurements in 35 patients, the repeatability of the TGM measurements was not significantly different from that of saline dilution. There was a highly significant correlation between the two techniques with an acceptable confidence level for limits of agreement for the difference between them. It took about 9 min to complete the TGM method and about 5 min for saline dilution. Our studies show that the novel TGM method showed excellent agreement and reproducibility with the saline dilution method without the need for indicator dilution.
血管通路血流量减少会带来血栓形成风险。我们提出了一种新的技术,可在透析过程中基于体外温度梯度及其变化来测量血管通路血流量,该技术通过反转体外血路而无需注射指示剂。在正常血路位置以及手动切换血路后,使用相同的体外血流量,通过血液温度监测仪测量内瘘温度。将我们的温度梯度法(TGM)测得的通路血流量与通过盐水稀释法测得的通路血流量进行比较,并在随后几周对同一患者重复测量。在35例患者的70对TGM和盐水稀释测量中,TGM测量的重复性与盐水稀释法无显著差异。两种技术之间存在高度显著的相关性,两者差异的一致性界限具有可接受的置信水平。完成TGM方法约需9分钟,盐水稀释法约需5分钟。我们的研究表明,这种新型TGM方法与盐水稀释法具有极好的一致性和可重复性,且无需指示剂稀释。