Seeling W, Bothner U, Eifert B, Rockemann M, Schreiber M, Schürmann W, Steffen P, Zeininger A
Universitätsklinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum der Universität Ulm.
Anaesthesist. 1991 Nov;40(11):614-23.
In 1987, Yeager et al. reported that intraoperative epidural anesthesia with local anesthetics and postoperative epidural analgesia with opiates diminished postoperative morbidity. In our first clinical trial on this topic, the better postoperative analgesia with epidural bupivacaine-fentanyl failed to improve the outcome after major abdominal operations over that obtained with parenteral piritramide. This randomized controlled investigation was designed to assess whether intraoperative epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine plus light general anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia with morphine would diminish the overall rate of postoperative complications after major abdominal operations compared with general anesthesia (without epidural) followed by patient controlled analgesia with morphine, and with intraoperative epidural anesthesia with bupivacaine and light general anesthesia followed by postoperative bupivacaine-morphine analgesia. METHODS. A total of 292 patients undergoing infrarenal aortic bypass operation, gastric resection, gastrectomy, duodenum-preserving pancreatic resection, Whipple's operation or cystectomy and neobladder formation were randomly divided into three groups: 1. PCA group (patient controlled analgesia, n = 107): patients were operated on under general anesthesia (midazolam, fentanyl, N2O/O2, if necessary with addition of halothane, enflurane or isoflurane; muscle relaxation with pancuronium bromide). Postoperative management consisted in patient-controlled analgesia with morphine (Prominject), bolus 2 mg, lock-out 5 min (recovery room, intensive care unit) or 15 min (surgical ward). 2. EBM group (epidural bupivacaine+morphine, n = 95): operation under light general anesthesia (midazolam, low-dose fentanyl, N2O/O2, pancuronium bromide). In addition, a mixture of bupivacaine (0.25%) and morphine (60 micrograms/ml) was infused (approximately 0.1 ml/kg.h) via an epidural catheter during and after the operation (approximately 72 h). 3. EM group (epidural morphine, n = 90): operation under the same kind of general-epidural anesthesia as in the EBM group. Postoperatively, epidural injection of morphine (0.05 mg/kg in 10 ml of saline) on request up to the 3rd postoperative day. Quality of analgesia (at rest and when patients coughed vigorously), strength of cough, and rate-pressure product were recorded at 8:00 h, 12:00 noon, 16:00 h and 20:00 h on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd postoperative days. Incidence and intensity of all postoperative complications (cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal and other organ failure, reoperations, major infection, sepsis, thromboembolism, metabolic and mental disturbances) were assessed from the day of operation until discharge or death (n = 10), respectively. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. In the PCA and EM groups analgesia was equal but of slightly inferior quality compared with the EBM group. The ability to cough was best in the EBM group and significantly worse in the PCA and EM groups, with no difference between the last two. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
1987年,耶格尔等人报告称,术中使用局部麻醉药进行硬膜外麻醉以及术后使用阿片类药物进行硬膜外镇痛可降低术后发病率。在我们关于该主题的首次临床试验中,与胃肠外匹米诺定相比,硬膜外布比卡因 - 芬太尼带来的更好的术后镇痛效果未能改善大腹部手术后的结局。这项随机对照研究旨在评估与全身麻醉(无硬膜外麻醉)后使用吗啡进行患者自控镇痛以及术中使用布比卡因进行硬膜外麻醉和浅全身麻醉后使用布比卡因 - 吗啡进行术后镇痛相比,术中使用布比卡因加浅全身麻醉进行硬膜外麻醉以及术后使用吗啡进行硬膜外镇痛是否会降低大腹部手术后的总体术后并发症发生率。方法。总共292例接受肾下主动脉搭桥手术、胃切除术、胃大部切除术、保留十二指肠的胰切除术、惠普尔手术或膀胱切除术及新膀胱形成术的患者被随机分为三组:1. PCA组(患者自控镇痛,n = 107):患者在全身麻醉下手术(咪达唑仑、芬太尼、N2O/O2,必要时加用氟烷、恩氟烷或异氟烷;用潘库溴铵进行肌肉松弛)。术后管理包括使用吗啡(普洛美辛)进行患者自控镇痛,推注量2 mg,锁定时间5分钟(恢复室、重症监护病房)或15分钟(外科病房)。2. EBM组(硬膜外布比卡因 + 吗啡,n = 95):在浅全身麻醉下手术(咪达唑仑、低剂量芬太尼、N2O/O2、潘库溴铵)。此外,在手术期间和术后(约72小时)通过硬膜外导管输注布比卡因(0.25%)和吗啡(60微克/毫升)的混合物(约0.1毫升/千克·小时)。3. EM组(硬膜外吗啡,n = 90):在与EBM组相同类型的全身 - 硬膜外麻醉下手术。术后,根据需要在术后第3天内硬膜外注射吗啡(0.05毫克/千克溶于10毫升生理盐水中)。术后第1、2和3天的8:00、中午12:00、16:00和20:00记录镇痛质量(静息时和患者剧烈咳嗽时)、咳嗽强度和心率 - 血压乘积。从手术当天直至出院或死亡(n = 10)分别评估所有术后并发症(心血管、肺部、肾脏和其他器官衰竭、再次手术、严重感染、败血症、血栓栓塞、代谢和精神障碍)的发生率和严重程度。结果与讨论。PCA组和EM组的镇痛效果相当,但与EBM组相比质量略差。EBM组的咳嗽能力最佳,PCA组和EM组明显较差,后两组之间无差异。(摘要截断于400字)