Suppr超能文献

[腹部大手术后使用硬膜外导管镇痛并不能减少术后并发症]

[No reduction in postoperative complications by the use of catheterized epidural analgesia following major abdominal surgery].

作者信息

Seeling W, Bruckmooser K P, Hüfner C, Kneitinger E, Rigg C, Rockemann M

机构信息

Universitätsklinik für Anaesthesiologie, Klinikum der Universität Ulm.

出版信息

Anaesthesist. 1990 Jan;39(1):33-40.

PMID:2407144
Abstract

This study was designed to assess whether intra- and postoperative epidural analgesia would diminish the overall rate of postoperative complications after major abdominal operations when compared to a standard anesthetic and postoperative analgesic regimen. A total of 214 patients undergoing infrarenal aortic bypass operations, gastric resection, gastrectomy, Whipple's operation, or duodenum-preserving pancreatic resection were randomly divided into two groups. Patients in the epidural group (n = 98) were operated on under light general anesthesia (midazolam, low-dose fentanyl, N2O/O2, pancuronium bromide). In addition, a mixture of bupivacaine (0.25%) and fentanyl (2 micrograms/ml) was infused (6-10 ml/h) via a thoracic epidural catheter intra- and postoperatively for 76:1.45 h (logarithmic normal distribution). Patients in the control group (n = 116) were operated on under a standard general anesthesia (midazolam, fentanyl, N2O/O2, isoflurane, pancuronium-bromide). Piritramid was injected for postoperative pain relief, either i.v. (recovery room, intensive care unit) or i.m. (surgical ward). In the epidural group the quality of analgesia and ability to cough were significantly better (2 P less than 0.0071) than in the control group (four observations each on the 1st and 2nd postoperative days). Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were lower in the epidural group at the same points of observation (2 P less than 0.01), as was the plasma glucose on the 1st postoperative day. The time up to the first postoperative defecation was shorter in the epidural group (79:1.51 h) as compared to the control group (93:1.38 h; 2 P less than 0.0167). The time to hospital discharge was equal in both groups (epidural group 19:1.6 days, control group 18:1.6 days).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

本研究旨在评估与标准麻醉和术后镇痛方案相比,术中和术后硬膜外镇痛是否会降低腹部大手术后的总体并发症发生率。共有214例行肾下主动脉搭桥术、胃切除术、胃大部切除术、惠普尔手术或保留十二指肠的胰腺切除术的患者被随机分为两组。硬膜外组(n = 98)患者在浅全身麻醉(咪达唑仑、低剂量芬太尼、N2O/O2、潘库溴铵)下接受手术。此外,通过胸段硬膜外导管在术中和术后以6 - 10 ml/h的速度输注布比卡因(0.25%)和芬太尼(2微克/毫升)的混合液76:1.45小时(对数正态分布)。对照组(n = 116)患者在标准全身麻醉(咪达唑仑、芬太尼、N2O/O2、异氟烷、潘库溴铵)下接受手术。术后疼痛缓解采用匹米诺定,静脉注射(恢复室、重症监护病房)或肌内注射(外科病房)。在硬膜外组,镇痛质量和咳嗽能力明显优于对照组(术后第1天和第2天各进行4次观察,P < 0.0071)。在相同观察点,硬膜外组的心率和平均动脉压较低(P < 0.01),术后第1天的血浆葡萄糖水平也是如此。与对照组(93:1.38小时)相比,硬膜外组术后首次排便时间更短(79:1.51小时;P < 0.0167)。两组的出院时间相等(硬膜外组19:1.6天,对照组18:1.6天)。(摘要截短至250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验