Murcutt Gareth
Center for Nephrology, Royal Free and University Hospital Medical Schools, Royal Free Hospital Campus, London, UK.
J Ren Care. 2008 Jun;34(2):101-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-6686.2008.00019.x.
The paper discussed during autumn 2007 was a report entitled 'Cannulating in haemodialysis: rope-ladder or buttonhole technique?' published in Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation. The authors agreed to follow the discussion and respond to points raised. Twenty-three expert contributors from 13 different countries provided evidence, opinion and historical insights into vascular access techniques for chronic haemodialysis patients. All contributors who had introduced the buttonhole technique for patients with native arterio-venous fistulas (AVFs) had found benefits for patients in terms of ease of cannulation, reduced pain and even reduced aneurysm formation. The discussion included expert advice on needling protocols, track formation and the sharp versus blunt needles debate. The buttonhole technique is virtually unheard of in some countries and the discussion covered some of the potential barriers to its introduction and offered advice on also how to overcome some of these issues.
2007年秋季讨论的论文是一篇发表于《肾脏病透析移植杂志》的题为《血液透析中的穿刺:绳梯式还是扣眼技术?》的报告。作者们同意跟进讨论并回应提出的问题。来自13个不同国家的23位专家贡献者提供了关于慢性血液透析患者血管通路技术的证据、观点和历史见解。所有为自体动静脉内瘘(AVF)患者引入扣眼技术的贡献者都发现,该技术在穿刺容易程度、减轻疼痛甚至减少动脉瘤形成方面对患者有益。讨论内容包括关于穿刺方案、通道形成以及锐针与钝针之争的专家建议。扣眼技术在一些国家几乎闻所未闻,讨论涵盖了其引入的一些潜在障碍,并就如何克服其中一些问题提供了建议。