Steyerberg Ewout W, Neville Bridget, Weeks Jane C, Earle Craig C
Center for Medical Decision Making, Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jun 10;25(17):2389-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7931.
PURPOSE To determine the impact of demographics and comorbidity on access to specialists' services, treatment, and outcome for patients with locoregional esophageal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of 3,538 patients older than age 65 years who were diagnosed with locoregional esophageal cancer between 1991 and 1999 in one of 11 regions monitored by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results tumor program. We examined linked Medicare claims for assessment by a surgeon, radiation oncologist, or medical oncologist and subsequent treatment with surgery, radiation, or chemotherapy. Logistic regression analyses were performed for seeing a specialist and for undergoing treatment according to age, sex, race, socioeconomic status, geographic region, and presence of comorbidities. Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for survival with and without adjustment for treatment received. Results Seeing a cancer specialist depended especially on age and region of diagnosis. These same factors were also related to subsequent treatment decisions, but associations were reversed in some regions, such that treatment depended less on region. Older patients had poorer survival (HR = 2.0 for 85+ v 65 to 69 years), which was partly explained by treatment received (HR decreased to 1.5 when adjusted for treatment). CONCLUSION Older patients have less intensive treatment of esophageal cancer, which is explained by both a lower rate of seeing a cancer specialist and by less intensive treatment once seen. Referring physicians and treating specialists must ensure that elderly patients are not deprived of the opportunity to consider all of their treatment options.
目的 确定人口统计学因素和合并症对局部区域性食管癌患者获得专科医生服务、治疗及治疗结果的影响。患者与方法 我们对3538例65岁以上患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,这些患者于1991年至1999年间在监测、流行病学及最终结果肿瘤项目所监测的11个地区之一被诊断为局部区域性食管癌。我们审查了相关的医疗保险理赔记录,以评估外科医生、放射肿瘤学家或医学肿瘤学家的评估情况以及随后进行的手术、放疗或化疗治疗。根据年龄、性别、种族、社会经济地位、地理区域和合并症情况,对是否看专科医生及是否接受治疗进行了逻辑回归分析。进行Cox比例风险分析以估计接受治疗和未接受治疗情况下生存的风险比(HR)。结果 是否看癌症专科医生尤其取决于年龄和诊断地区。这些相同因素也与后续治疗决策相关,但在某些地区关联情况相反,即治疗对地区的依赖程度降低。老年患者生存率较低(85岁及以上患者与65至69岁患者相比,HR = 2.0),部分原因是接受的治疗(调整治疗因素后,HR降至1.5)。结论 老年食管癌患者接受的治疗强度较低,这既可以通过看癌症专科医生的比例较低来解释,也可以通过就诊后接受的治疗强度较低来解释。转诊医生和治疗专科医生必须确保老年患者不会被剥夺考虑所有治疗选择的机会。