Fielding William J
Planning Unit, The College of The Bahamas, New Providence, The Bahamas.
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2007;10(2):153-68. doi: 10.1080/10888700701313587.
Interviews with 509 adults in New Providence, The Bahamas, indicated that people have limited knowledge of dog care and the laws pertaining to nonhuman animal welfare. Interviews also indicated that many dogs received care limited only to food and water and--to a lesser extent--shelter. Potcakes (local mongrels) received the least health care; "breed" dogs, the most. Primary caregivers gave the impression that dogs were better cared for than did nonprimary caregivers. Although some educational messages must distinguish between those who do--and do not--live in dog-keeping households, others need not. For example, myths associated with neutering are more deeply entrenched in the general population than within members of dog-keeping households. However, all respondents had an inadequate knowledge of the law relating to dog care.
对巴哈马新普罗维登斯岛的509名成年人进行的访谈表明,人们对犬类护理以及与非人类动物福利相关的法律了解有限。访谈还表明,许多狗得到的护理仅限于食物和水,在较小程度上还有住所。当地杂种狗得到的医疗护理最少;“纯种”狗得到的最多。主要照顾者给人的印象是,他们对狗的照顾比非主要照顾者更好。虽然一些教育信息必须区分养狗家庭和不养狗家庭的人群,但其他信息则不必如此。例如,与绝育相关的误解在普通人群中比在养狗家庭的成员中更为根深蒂固。然而,所有受访者对与犬类护理相关的法律都了解不足。