Sabatine Marc S, Morrow David A, Dalby Anthony, Pfisterer Mathias, Duris Tibor, Lopez-Sendon Jose, Murphy Sabina A, Gao Runlin, Antman Elliott M, Braunwald Eugene
Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jun 12;49(23):2256-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.01.092. Epub 2007 May 25.
The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin (ENOX) versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) receiving fibrinolytic therapy with and without clopidogrel.
The efficacy and safety of ENOX and clopidogrel given together in STEMI remains to be defined.
We compared the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) as well as the rates of bleeding in medically managed patients randomized to ENOX versus UFH in the ExTRACT-TIMI 25 (Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 25) trial, stratified by concomitant clopidogrel use.
Enoxaparin significantly reduced the rate of the composite of death, recurrent myocardial infarction, myocardial ischemia, or stroke, compared with UFH, both in patients (n = 2,173) treated with clopidogrel (10.8% vs. 13.9%, adjusted odds ratio [OR(adj)] 0.70, p = 0.013) and in patients (n = 12,918) not treated with clopidogrel (13.3% vs. 15.3%, OR(adj) 0.85, p = 0.003) with no evidence of heterogeneity (p(interaction) = 0.21). The excess risk of TIMI major bleeding with ENOX versus UFH was numerically but not statistically significantly higher in patients treated with clopidogrel (2.7% vs. 1.0%) versus those who were not (2.1% vs. 1.2%) (p(interaction) = 0.61). Net clinical benefit (MACE and major bleeding) favored treatment with ENOX over UFH, either with concomitant clopidogrel (absolute risk reduction 2.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.5% to 5.3%) or without (absolute risk reduction 1.7%, 95% CI 0.5% to 3.0%) (p(interaction) = 0.61).
In patients with STEMI receiving fibrinolytic therapy, the net benefit of ENOX is similar in patients who are and are not treated with clopidogrel. The totality of trial data suggest that the combination of a fibrinolytic, aspirin, clopidogrel, and ENOX offers an attractive pharmacologic reperfusion strategy in STEMI.
本研究旨在确定在接受或未接受氯吡格雷治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中,依诺肝素(ENOX)与普通肝素(UFH)相比的疗效和安全性。
ENOX与氯吡格雷联合用于STEMI的疗效和安全性仍有待确定。
在ExTRACT-TIMI 25(急性心肌梗死治疗中依诺肝素与溶栓再灌注-心肌梗死溶栓25)试验中,我们比较了随机接受ENOX与UFH治疗的药物治疗患者的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率以及出血发生率,并根据是否同时使用氯吡格雷进行分层。
与UFH相比,依诺肝素显著降低了死亡、再发心肌梗死、心肌缺血或卒中复合终点的发生率,在接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者(n = 2173)中(10.8%对13.9%,调整优势比[OR(adj)]0.70,p = 0.013)以及未接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者(n = 12918)中(13.3%对·15.3%,OR(adj)0.85,p = 0.003)均如此,且无异质性证据(p(交互作用)= 0.21)。与UFH相比,接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者中依诺肝素导致的TIMI大出血额外风险在数值上较高但无统计学显著差异(2.7%对1.0%),未接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者中则为(2.1%对1.2%)(p(交互作用)= 0.61)。净临床获益(MACE和大出血)方面,无论是同时使用氯吡格雷(绝对风险降低2.4%,95%置信区间[CI]-0.5%至5.3%)还是不使用(绝对风险降低1.7%,95%CI 0.5%至3.0%),依诺肝素治疗均优于UFH(p(交互作用)= 0.61)。
在接受溶栓治疗的STEMI患者中,接受和未接受氯吡格雷治疗的患者使用依诺肝素的净获益相似。试验数据总体表明,溶栓剂、阿司匹林、氯吡格雷和依诺肝素联合使用为STEMI提供了一种有吸引力的药物再灌注策略。