Suppr超能文献

急诊科中具有非典型胸痛、心电图无诊断意义及生化标志物阴性的患者,早期静息和负荷心肌灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描及心电图运动试验的诊断价值。

Yield of early rest and stress myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography and electrocardiographic exercise test in patients with atypical chest pain, nondiagnostic electrocardiogram, and negative biochemical markers in the emergency department.

作者信息

Candell-Riera Jaume, Oller-Martínez Guillermo, de León Gustavo, Castell-Conesa Joan, Aguadé-Bruix Santiago

机构信息

Servei de Cardiologia, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jun 15;99(12):1662-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2007.01.048. Epub 2007 May 4.

Abstract

There are no studies in which diagnostic yield of early rest myocardial perfusion gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), electrocardiographic exercise testing, and stress SPECT were compared in patients with atypical chest pain, nondiagnostic electrocardiograms (ECGs), and negative markers of myocardial damage in the emergency department. A prospective study of 96 patients who presented with atypical chest pain and nondiagnostic ECG, but without elevated markers of necrosis, was performed. All underwent rest gated SPECT using technetium-99m methoxyisobutyl isonitrile within 6 hours after pain subsided followed by an electrocardiographic exercise test to obtain stress-rest SPECT images. After 1 year, there were no deaths and coronary artery disease was confirmed in only 5 patients. Negative predictive values of the 3 techniques were high (99%, 96%, and 100%, respectively), but positive predictive values were low (27%, 22%, and 14%, respectively). Sensitivities of early SPECT (80%) and stress SPECT (100%) were higher than for the electrocardiographic exercise test (40%). In conclusion, in patients with atypical chest pain, nondiagnostic ECG, and negative biochemical markers, negative predictive values of the 3 tests analyzed are very high. The sensitivity of radionuclide tests is higher, but their widespread use does not appear warranted because their positive predictive value and incidence of complications is low.

摘要

在急诊科,针对非典型胸痛、心电图(ECG)检查未确诊且心肌损伤标志物为阴性的患者,尚无研究对早期静息心肌灌注门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)、心电图运动试验和负荷SPECT的诊断率进行比较。对96例出现非典型胸痛且心电图检查未确诊,但坏死标志物未升高的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。所有患者在疼痛缓解后6小时内使用锝-99m甲氧基异丁基异腈进行静息门控SPECT检查,随后进行心电图运动试验以获取负荷-静息SPECT图像。1年后,无死亡病例,仅5例确诊为冠状动脉疾病。这3种技术的阴性预测值较高(分别为99%、96%和100%),但阳性预测值较低(分别为27%、22%和14%)。早期SPECT(80%)和负荷SPECT(100%)的敏感性高于心电图运动试验(40%)。总之,对于非典型胸痛、心电图检查未确诊且生化标志物为阴性的患者,所分析的这3项检查的阴性预测值非常高。放射性核素检查的敏感性较高,但由于其阳性预测值和并发症发生率较低,似乎没有必要广泛应用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验