Olbrisch M E, Levenson J L
Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond.
J Heart Lung Transplant. 1991 Nov-Dec;10(6):948-55.
Heart transplant programs were surveyed regarding psychosocial evaluation process, criteria, and outcomes. There was considerable disagreement among programs when a patient is rejected on psychosocial grounds with regard to the use of second opinions and how often patients are informed of the reasons. Wide discrepancies in criteria used and rates of patients refused on psychosocial grounds were discovered. More than 70% of all programs excluded patients for transplantation on the grounds of dementia, active schizophrenia, current suicidal ideation, history of multiple suicide attempts, severe mental retardation, current heavy alcohol use, and current use of addictive drugs. Lack of consensus was found for some exclusion criteria (cigarette smoking, obesity, noncompliance, recent alcohol or drug abuse, criminality, personality disorder, mild mental retardation, controlled schizophrenia, and affective disorder). The proportion of patients rejected for transplantation on psychosocial grounds ranged from 0% to 37%, with an average rate of 5.6% in the United States and 2.5% in non-U.S. programs. This survey thus supports the need for research on the validity and reliability of psychosocial selection criteria.
针对心脏移植项目开展了关于心理社会评估流程、标准及结果的调查。各项目之间存在较大分歧,即当患者因心理社会因素被拒绝时,对于二次评估意见的使用情况以及告知患者拒绝理由的频率。调查发现,在使用的标准以及因心理社会因素而被拒绝的患者比例方面存在很大差异。超过70%的项目基于痴呆、活跃型精神分裂症、当前自杀意念、多次自杀未遂史、严重智力障碍、当前大量饮酒以及当前使用成瘾性药物等原因将患者排除在移植之外。对于一些排除标准(吸烟、肥胖、不依从、近期酗酒或药物滥用、犯罪、人格障碍、轻度智力障碍、病情得到控制的精神分裂症以及情感障碍)未达成共识。因心理社会因素被拒绝移植的患者比例从0%到37%不等,在美国平均比例为5.6%,在非美国的项目中为2.5%。因此,这项调查支持了对心理社会选择标准的有效性和可靠性进行研究的必要性。