Picard Frederic, Leitner Francois, Gregori Alberto, Martin Philippe
Health and Biotech Department of the Ecole Centrale de Paris, Grande Voie des Vignes, Châtenay-Malabry Cedex, France.
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jun;22(4):590-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.027. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
Computer-assisted technology allows the accurate location of inaccessible landmarks such as the center of the hip in total hip arthroplasty. Using 7 fresh normal cadaveric hips, we conducted 2 studies. The first study compared iliac (A) vs no iliac (B) tracking. The second study assessed the reliability of the hip center acquisition using the range of hip motion during manipulation. The first study revealed no statistical difference between the 2 techniques A (mean, 0.67; SD, 0.15) and B (mean, 0.66; SD, 0.32) used to locate the center of the hip. In the second study, a range of motion less than 10 degrees negatively affected accuracy. Using this technology, without an iliac tracker, allows accurate and precise determination of the center of the hip.
计算机辅助技术能够精确确定全髋关节置换术中难以触及的标志点位置,比如髋关节中心。我们使用7个新鲜的正常尸体髋关节进行了两项研究。第一项研究比较了使用髂骨追踪(A)与不使用髂骨追踪(B)的情况。第二项研究评估了在操作过程中利用髋关节活动范围获取髋关节中心的可靠性。第一项研究显示,用于定位髋关节中心的两种技术A(均值为0.67;标准差为0.15)和B(均值为0.66;标准差为0.32)之间无统计学差异。在第二项研究中,活动范围小于10度会对准确性产生负面影响。使用这项技术,不使用髂骨追踪器也能准确、精确地确定髋关节中心。