• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

髋关节中心评估中形式化方法的评估:一项体外分析。

Evaluation of formal methods in hip joint center assessment: an in vitro analysis.

作者信息

Lopomo Nicola, Sun Lei, Zaffagnini Stefano, Giordano Giovanni, Safran Marc R

机构信息

Laboratorio di Biomeccanica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2010 Mar;25(3):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.11.008. Epub 2009 Dec 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.11.008
PMID:20006913
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The hip joint center is a fundamental landmark in the identification of lower limb mechanical axis; errors in its location lead to substantial inaccuracies both in joint reconstruction and in gait analysis. Actually in Computer Aided Surgery functional non-invasive procedures have been tested in identifying this landmark, but an anatomical validation is scarcely discussed.

METHODS

A navigation system was used to acquire data on eight cadaveric hips. Pivoting functional maneuver and hip joint anatomy were analyzed. Two functional methods - both with and without using the pelvic tracker - were evaluated: specifically a sphere fit method and a transformation techniques. The positions of the estimated centers with respect to the anatomical center of the femoral head, the influence of this deviation on the kinematic assessment and on the identification of femoral mechanical axis were analyzed.

FINDINGS

We found that the implemented transformation technique was the most reliable estimation of hip joint center, introducing a - Mean (SD) - difference of 1.6 (2.7) mm from the anatomical center with the pelvic tracker, whereas sphere fit method without it demonstrated the lowest accuracy with 25.2 (18.9) mm of deviation. Otherwise both the methods reported similar accuracy (<3mm of deviation).

INTERPRETATION

The functional estimations resulted in the best case to be in an average of less than 2mm from the anatomical center, which corresponds to angular deviations of the femoral mechanical axis smaller than 1.7 (1.3) degrees and negligible errors in kinematic assessment of angular displacements.

摘要

背景

髋关节中心是确定下肢机械轴的一个基本标志;其位置误差会导致关节重建和步态分析中出现重大不准确。实际上,在计算机辅助手术中,已对功能性非侵入性程序进行测试以确定该标志,但解剖学验证很少被讨论。

方法

使用导航系统获取八个尸体髋关节的数据。分析了枢转功能操作和髋关节解剖结构。评估了两种功能方法——使用和不使用骨盆追踪器:具体为球拟合方法和变换技术。分析了估计中心相对于股骨头解剖中心的位置、这种偏差对运动学评估和股骨机械轴识别的影响。

结果

我们发现,实施的变换技术是对髋关节中心最可靠的估计,使用骨盆追踪器时与解剖中心的平均(标准差)差异为1.6(2.7)毫米,而不使用它的球拟合方法偏差为25.2(18.9)毫米,准确性最低。否则,两种方法的准确性相似(偏差<3毫米)。

解读

功能估计在最佳情况下与解剖中心的平均距离小于2毫米,这对应于股骨机械轴的角度偏差小于1.7(1.3)度,并且在角位移运动学评估中的误差可忽略不计。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of formal methods in hip joint center assessment: an in vitro analysis.髋关节中心评估中形式化方法的评估:一项体外分析。
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2010 Mar;25(3):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.11.008. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
2
Test bed for assessment of the kinematical determination of navigation systems for total knee arthroplasty. Does a limited range of motion of the hip joint influence the accuracy of the determination?全膝关节置换术中导航系统运动学测定评估的试验台。髋关节活动范围受限会影响测定的准确性吗?
Comput Aided Surg. 2005 Jan;10(1):51-7. doi: 10.3109/10929080500228597.
3
Detection of the center of the hip joint in computer-assisted surgery: an evaluation study of the Surgetics algorithm.计算机辅助手术中髋关节中心的检测:Surgetics算法的评估研究
Comput Aided Surg. 2005 May;10(3):133-9. doi: 10.3109/10929080500229975.
4
Virtual axis finder: a new method to determine the two kinematic axes of rotation for the tibio-femoral joint.虚拟轴定位器:一种确定胫股关节两个运动旋转轴的新方法。
J Biomech Eng. 2010 Jan;132(1):011009. doi: 10.1115/1.4000163.
5
A survey of formal methods for determining the centre of rotation of ball joints.用于确定球形接头旋转中心的形式化方法综述。
J Biomech. 2006;39(15):2798-809. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.10.002. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
6
In-vitro experimental assessment of a new robust algorithm for hip joint centre estimation.一种用于髋关节中心估计的新型稳健算法的体外实验评估。
J Biomech. 2009 May 29;42(8):989-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.02.031. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
7
A new method for estimating joint parameters from motion data.一种从运动数据估计关节参数的新方法。
J Biomech. 2005 Jan;38(1):107-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.03.009.
8
A cadaveric study to assess the accuracy of computer-assisted surgery in locating the hip center during total knee arthroplasty.一项尸体研究,旨在评估全膝关节置换术中计算机辅助手术定位髋关节中心的准确性。
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jun;22(4):590-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.027. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
9
A framework for the functional identification of joint centers using markerless motion capture, validation for the hip joint.一种使用无标记运动捕捉功能识别关节中心的框架:髋关节验证
J Biomech. 2007;40(15):3510-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.05.029. Epub 2007 Aug 13.
10
Hip joint centre location: an ex vivo study.髋关节中心定位:一项体外研究。
J Biomech. 2009 May 11;42(7):818-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.01.031. Epub 2009 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Calibration procedure and biomechanical validation of an universal six degree-of-freedom robotic system for hip joint testing.髋关节测试通用六自由度机器人系统的校准程序和生物力学验证。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Mar 3;18(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03601-2.
2
Total Knee Arthroplasty Violates the Law of Burmester-A Biomechanical Investigation.全膝关节置换术违反了布尔梅斯特定律——一项生物力学研究。
J Pers Med. 2022 Dec 24;13(1):36. doi: 10.3390/jpm13010036.
3
Validation of an optical, computer-assisted technique for intraoperative tracking of 3-dimensional canine stifle joint motion.
验证一种用于术中跟踪犬膝关节 3 维运动的光学、计算机辅助技术。
Open Vet J. 2020 Apr;10(1):86-93. doi: 10.4314/ovj.v10i1.14. Epub 2020 Mar 22.
4
The Accuracy of Alignment Determined by Patient-Specific Instrumentation System in Total Knee Arthroplasty.全膝关节置换术中患者特异性器械系统确定的对线准确性。
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2019 Mar 1;31(1):19-24. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.18.038.
5
Evaluation of functional methods of joint centre determination for quasi-planar movement.评估用于准平面运动的关节中心确定的功能方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 17;14(1):e0210807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210807. eCollection 2019.
6
Kinematic component alignment in total knee arthroplasty leads to better restoration of natural tibiofemoral kinematics compared to mechanic alignment.全膝关节置换术中的运动学组件对线可使胫骨股骨运动学恢复更接近自然状态,优于机械对线。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 May;27(5):1427-1433. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5105-1. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
7
In vitro hip testing in the International Society of Biomechanics coordinate system.在国际生物力学学会坐标系下的体外髋关节测试。
J Biomech. 2016 Dec 8;49(16):4154-4158. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.036. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
8
The accuracy of the use of functional hip motions on localization of the center of the hip.髋关节功能运动定位髋关节中心的准确性。
HSS J. 2012 Oct;8(3):192-7. doi: 10.1007/s11420-012-9296-6. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
9
Applications of computer navigation in sports medicine knee surgery: an evidence-based review.计算机导航在运动医学膝关节手术中的应用:基于循证的综述。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013 Jun;6(2):150-7. doi: 10.1007/s12178-013-9166-y.
10
No difference in accuracy between pinless and conventional computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty.在全膝关节置换术中,无针式与传统计算机辅助手术的准确性无差异。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Aug;22(8):1819-26. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2430-2. Epub 2013 Feb 1.