Suppr超能文献

髋关节中心评估中形式化方法的评估:一项体外分析。

Evaluation of formal methods in hip joint center assessment: an in vitro analysis.

作者信息

Lopomo Nicola, Sun Lei, Zaffagnini Stefano, Giordano Giovanni, Safran Marc R

机构信息

Laboratorio di Biomeccanica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2010 Mar;25(3):206-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.11.008. Epub 2009 Dec 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The hip joint center is a fundamental landmark in the identification of lower limb mechanical axis; errors in its location lead to substantial inaccuracies both in joint reconstruction and in gait analysis. Actually in Computer Aided Surgery functional non-invasive procedures have been tested in identifying this landmark, but an anatomical validation is scarcely discussed.

METHODS

A navigation system was used to acquire data on eight cadaveric hips. Pivoting functional maneuver and hip joint anatomy were analyzed. Two functional methods - both with and without using the pelvic tracker - were evaluated: specifically a sphere fit method and a transformation techniques. The positions of the estimated centers with respect to the anatomical center of the femoral head, the influence of this deviation on the kinematic assessment and on the identification of femoral mechanical axis were analyzed.

FINDINGS

We found that the implemented transformation technique was the most reliable estimation of hip joint center, introducing a - Mean (SD) - difference of 1.6 (2.7) mm from the anatomical center with the pelvic tracker, whereas sphere fit method without it demonstrated the lowest accuracy with 25.2 (18.9) mm of deviation. Otherwise both the methods reported similar accuracy (<3mm of deviation).

INTERPRETATION

The functional estimations resulted in the best case to be in an average of less than 2mm from the anatomical center, which corresponds to angular deviations of the femoral mechanical axis smaller than 1.7 (1.3) degrees and negligible errors in kinematic assessment of angular displacements.

摘要

背景

髋关节中心是确定下肢机械轴的一个基本标志;其位置误差会导致关节重建和步态分析中出现重大不准确。实际上,在计算机辅助手术中,已对功能性非侵入性程序进行测试以确定该标志,但解剖学验证很少被讨论。

方法

使用导航系统获取八个尸体髋关节的数据。分析了枢转功能操作和髋关节解剖结构。评估了两种功能方法——使用和不使用骨盆追踪器:具体为球拟合方法和变换技术。分析了估计中心相对于股骨头解剖中心的位置、这种偏差对运动学评估和股骨机械轴识别的影响。

结果

我们发现,实施的变换技术是对髋关节中心最可靠的估计,使用骨盆追踪器时与解剖中心的平均(标准差)差异为1.6(2.7)毫米,而不使用它的球拟合方法偏差为25.2(18.9)毫米,准确性最低。否则,两种方法的准确性相似(偏差<3毫米)。

解读

功能估计在最佳情况下与解剖中心的平均距离小于2毫米,这对应于股骨机械轴的角度偏差小于1.7(1.3)度,并且在角位移运动学评估中的误差可忽略不计。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验