Wearden John H, Norton Roger, Martin Simon, Montford-Bebb Oliver
School of Psychology, Keele University, Keele, STS, England, UK.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Jun;33(3):716-29. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.716.
In 3 experiments, the authors compared duration judgments of filled stimuli (tones) with unfilled ones (intervals defined by clicks or gaps in tones). Temporal generalization procedures (Experiment 1) and verbal estimation procedures (Experiments 2 and 3) all showed that subjective durations of the tones were considerably longer than those of unfilled intervals defined either by clicks or gaps, with the unfilled intervals being judged as approximately 55%-65% of the duration of the filled ones when real duration was the same. Analyses derived from the pacemaker-switch-accumulator clock model incorporated into scalar timing theory suggested that the filled/unfilled difference in mean estimates was due to higher pacemaker speed in the former case, although conclusively ruling out alternative interpretations in terms of attention remains difficult.
在3项实验中,作者比较了有填充刺激(纯音)和无填充刺激(由咔哒声或纯音中的间隙定义的间隔)的时长判断。时间泛化程序(实验1)和言语估计程序(实验2和3)均表明,纯音的主观时长明显长于由咔哒声或间隙定义的无填充间隔的时长,当实际时长相同时,无填充间隔的时长被判断为填充间隔时长的约55%-65%。纳入标量计时理论的起搏器-开关-累加器时钟模型的分析表明,平均估计中的填充/未填充差异是由于前一种情况下起搏器速度较高,尽管要确凿地排除注意力方面的其他解释仍然很困难。