Ostaszewski Pawel
Faculty of Psychology, Warsaw School of Social Psychology, Chodakowska, 19/31, 03-815 Warsaw, Poland.
Psychol Rep. 2007 Apr;100(2):653-60. doi: 10.2466/pr0.100.2.653-660.
Studies on temporal discounting typically involve choosing between two outcomes of the same sign, i.e., positive or negative. For example, participants often are given a choice between a smaller, sooner gain and a larger, but later gain, or (less commonly) the options may be a sooner, larger loss and a later, but smaller loss. In contrast, participants in this study (N= 129; 66 women and 63 men, volunteers from Warsaw, Poland, all employed, with college education, ranging in age from 23 to 50 years, M=32.3 yr., SD=7.4) had to make a yes-or-no decision as to whether they would accept a financial offer involving a combination of a gain and a loss. This offer could be either an immediate gain to be followed later by a larger loss or an immediate loss followed later by a larger gain. Despite the substantial differences between the options in the present study and those in typical discounting studies, the same hyperboloid discounting function that describes choice between immediate and delayed gains also accurately described choice in the substantially different situations presented in the present study. In addition, steeper discounting was observed with a smaller delayed outcome than with a larger delayed outcome.
关于时间折扣的研究通常涉及在两个同号结果之间进行选择,即正结果或负结果。例如,参与者常常要在一个较小但较早的收益与一个较大但较晚的收益之间做出选择,或者(不太常见的情况)选项可能是一个较早且较大的损失与一个较晚但较小的损失。相比之下,本研究中的参与者(N = 129;66名女性和63名男性,来自波兰华沙的志愿者,均为就业人员,拥有大学学历,年龄在23岁至50岁之间,M = 32.3岁,SD = 7.4)必须就是否接受一个涉及收益与损失组合的财务提议做出是或否的决定。这个提议可能是先有一个即时收益随后是一个更大的损失,或者先有一个即时损失随后是一个更大的收益。尽管本研究中的选项与典型折扣研究中的选项存在显著差异,但描述即时与延迟收益之间选择的相同双曲线折扣函数也准确地描述了本研究中呈现的截然不同情况下的选择。此外,观察到延迟结果较小时的折扣比延迟结果较大时更陡峭。