• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于视频的沟通技能测试:描述、开发及初步结果

The video-based test of communication skills: description, development, and preliminary findings.

作者信息

Mazor Kathleen M, Haley Heather-Lyn, Sullivan Kate, Quirk Mark E

机构信息

Meyers Primary Care Institute and Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01605, USA.

出版信息

Teach Learn Med. 2007 Spring;19(2):162-7. doi: 10.1080/10401330701333357.

DOI:10.1080/10401330701333357
PMID:17564544
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The importance of assessing physician-patient communication skills is widely recognized, but assessment methods are limited. Objective structured clinical examinations are time-consuming and resource intensive. For practicing physicians, patient surveys may be useful, but these also require substantial resources. Clearly, it would be advantageous to develop alternative or supplemental methods for assessing communication skills of medical students, residents, and physicians.

DESCRIPTION

The Video-based Test of Communication Skills (VTCS) is an innovative, computer-administered test, consisting of 20 very short video vignettes. In each vignette, a patient makes a statement or asks a question. The examinee responds verbally, as if it was a real encounter and he or she were the physician. Responses are recorded for later scoring. Test administration takes approximately 1 h.

EVALUATION

Generalizability studies were conducted, and scores for two groups of physicians predicted to differ in their communication skills were compared. Preliminary results are encouraging; the estimated g coefficient for the communication score for 20-vignette test (scored by five raters) is 0.79; g for the personal/affective score under the same conditions is 0.62. Differences between physicians were in the predicted direction, with physicians considered "at risk" for communication difficulties scoring lower than those not so identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The VTCS is a short, portable test of communication skills. Results reported here suggest that scores reflect differences in skill levels and are generalizable. However, these findings are based on very small sample sizes and must be considered preliminary. Additional work is required before it will be possible to argue confidently that this test in particular, and this approach to testing communication skills in general, is valuable and likely to make a substantial contribution to assessment in medical education.

摘要

背景

评估医患沟通技巧的重要性已得到广泛认可,但评估方法有限。客观结构化临床考试耗时且资源消耗大。对于执业医师而言,患者调查可能有用,但同样需要大量资源。显然,开发用于评估医学生、住院医师和医师沟通技巧的替代或补充方法将具有优势。

描述

基于视频的沟通技巧测试(VTCS)是一种创新的计算机管理测试,由20个非常短的视频片段组成。在每个片段中,患者会做出陈述或提出问题。考生进行口头回应,就好像这是一次真实的会面且他/她是医师一样。回应被记录下来以供后续评分。测试管理大约需要1小时。

评估

进行了可推广性研究,并比较了预计在沟通技巧方面存在差异的两组医师的分数。初步结果令人鼓舞;20个片段测试(由五名评分者评分)的沟通分数的估计g系数为0.79;在相同条件下个人/情感分数的g系数为0.62。医师之间的差异符合预期方向,被认为有沟通困难“风险”的医师得分低于未被如此认定的医师。

结论

VTCS是一种简短、便于携带的沟通技巧测试。此处报告的结果表明分数反映了技能水平的差异且具有可推广性。然而,这些发现基于非常小的样本量,必须被视为初步的。在能够有信心地认为这种测试,特别是这种测试沟通技巧的方法有价值并且可能对医学教育评估做出重大贡献之前,还需要进行更多工作。

相似文献

1
The video-based test of communication skills: description, development, and preliminary findings.基于视频的沟通技能测试:描述、开发及初步结果
Teach Learn Med. 2007 Spring;19(2):162-7. doi: 10.1080/10401330701333357.
2
Reflective teaching of medical communication skills with DiViDU: assessing the level of student reflection on recorded consultations with simulated patients.使用DiViDU进行医学沟通技能的反思性教学:评估学生对与模拟患者的会诊记录的反思水平。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Feb;74(2):142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.10.009. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
3
First-year medical students' assessment of their own communication skills: a video-based, open-ended approach.一年级医学生对自身沟通技巧的评估:一种基于视频的开放式方法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2007 Oct;68(2):161-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.05.018. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
4
Can interactive skills-based seminars with standardized patients enhance clinicians' prevention skills? Measuring the impact of a CME program.互动式基于技能的标准化患者研讨会能否提高临床医生的预防技能?评估一项 CME 项目的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Aug;80(2):248-52. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.11.015. Epub 2010 Jan 6.
5
Clinical competencies and the basic sciences: an online case tutorial paradigm for delivery of integrated clinical and basic science content.临床能力与基础科学:一种用于提供综合临床与基础科学内容的在线病例教程范式
Anat Sci Educ. 2009 Oct;2(5):238-43. doi: 10.1002/ase.97.
6
Assessment of medical communication skills by computer: assessment method and student experiences.利用计算机评估医学沟通技能:评估方法与学生体验
Med Educ. 2004 Aug;38(8):813-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.01900.x.
7
The implementation and assessment of a comprehensive communication skills training curriculum for oncologists.肿瘤学家综合沟通技巧培训课程的实施和评估。
Psychooncology. 2010 Jun;19(6):583-93. doi: 10.1002/pon.1585.
8
Teaching end-of-life care to family medicine residents--what do they learn?向家庭医学住院医师传授临终关怀——他们学到了什么?
Med Teach. 2009 Feb;31(2):e47-50. doi: 10.1080/01421590802331420.
9
[Improving communication skills is possible: "clinical" experience and scientific assessment].
Rev Med Suisse. 2006 Feb 8;2(52):390-2.
10
Training faculty to facilitate communication skills training: development and evaluation of a workshop.培训教员以促进沟通技能培训:一个工作坊的开发与评估
Patient Educ Couns. 2008 Mar;70(3):430-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.11.024. Epub 2008 Jan 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of a training program for occupational health professionals on the cognitions and perceptions of workers: a randomized controlled trial.职业健康专业人员培训计划对工人认知和感知的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2022 Jul;95(5):1059-1066. doi: 10.1007/s00420-021-01823-7. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
2
Video-Based Communication Assessment: Development of an Innovative System for Assessing Clinician-Patient Communication.基于视频的沟通评估:一种用于评估临床医生与患者沟通的创新系统的开发
JMIR Med Educ. 2019 Feb 14;5(1):e10400. doi: 10.2196/10400.
3
Individual differences in aversion to ambiguity regarding medical tests and treatments: association with cancer screening cognitions.
个体在对医学检查和治疗的模糊性厌恶方面的差异:与癌症筛查认知的关联。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Dec;23(12):2916-23. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0872. Epub 2014 Sep 25.
4
Assessing patient-centered communication in cancer care: stakeholder perspectives.评估癌症护理中的以患者为中心的沟通:利益相关者的观点。
J Oncol Pract. 2013 Sep;9(5):e186-93. doi: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000772. Epub 2013 May 14.
5
Using video-cases to assess student reflection: development and validation of an instrument.利用视频案例评估学生反思:工具的开发和验证。
BMC Med Educ. 2012 Apr 20;12:22. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-22.
6
What happens along the diagnostic pathway to CHD treatment? Qualitative results concerning cognitive processes.沿着 CHD 治疗的诊断途径会发生什么?关于认知过程的定性结果。
Sociol Health Illn. 2009 Nov;31(7):1077-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2009.01181.x. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
7
How are patient characteristics relevant for physicians' clinical decision making in diabetes? An analysis of qualitative results from a cross-national factorial experiment.患者特征如何与医生在糖尿病治疗中的临床决策相关?一项跨国析因实验的定性结果分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Nov;67(9):1391-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.07.005. Epub 2008 Aug 12.