Suppr超能文献

采用CLSI M40方法对两种斯图尔特液体拭子转运系统进行的评估与比较。

Evaluation and comparison of two Stuart's liquid swab transport systems tested by the CLSI M40 method.

作者信息

Van Horn K G, Rankin I

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Mt. Sinai Medical Center, One Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007 Aug;26(8):583-6. doi: 10.1007/s10096-007-0328-y.

Abstract

The Copan Diagnostics HealthLink Transporter swab and the Remel Bacti-Swab were evaluated by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M40-A quantitative swab elution method for maintenance of bacterial viability of six ATCC and six clinical strains. Acceptable levels of viability according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute criteria were maintained for all organisms tested with the HealthLink Transporter swab and for 8 of 12 organisms tested with the Bacti-Swab. In this study, the HealthLink Transporter swab maintained organism viability better than the Bacti-Swab.

摘要

采用临床和实验室标准协会M40-A定量拭子洗脱法,对Copan诊断公司的HealthLink转运拭子和Remel细菌拭子进行评估,以检测其对6株美国典型培养物保藏中心(ATCC)菌株和6株临床菌株的细菌活力维持情况。根据临床和实验室标准协会的标准,使用HealthLink转运拭子检测的所有微生物以及使用细菌拭子检测的12种微生物中的8种,均保持了可接受的活力水平。在本研究中,HealthLink转运拭子在维持微生物活力方面优于细菌拭子。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验