• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对哮喘中的二氧化碳分压:二氧化碳监测辅助呼吸训练的初步评估

Targeting pCO(2) in asthma: pilot evaluation of a capnometry-assisted breathing training.

作者信息

Meuret Alicia E, Ritz Thomas, Wilhelm Frank H, Roth Walton T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX 75205, USA.

出版信息

Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2007 Jun;32(2):99-109. doi: 10.1007/s10484-007-9036-8. Epub 2007 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1007/s10484-007-9036-8
PMID:17564826
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and potential benefits of a novel biofeedback breathing training for achieving sustained increases in pCO(2) levels.

METHODS

Twelve asthma patients were randomly assigned to an immediate 4-week treatment group or waiting list control. Patients were instructed to modify their respiration in order to change levels of end-tidal pCO(2) using a hand-held capnometer. Treatment outcome was assessed in frequency and distress of symptoms, asthma control, lung function, and variability of peak expiratory flow (PEF).

RESULTS

We found stable increases in pCO(2) and reductions in respiration rate during treatment and 2-month follow-up. Mean pCO(2) levels rose from a hypocapnic to a normocapnic range at follow-up. Frequency and distress of symptoms was reduced and reported asthma control increased. In addition, mean PEF variability decreased significantly in the treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our pilot intervention provided evidence for the feasibility of pCO(2)-biofeedback training in asthma patients.

摘要

目的

本初步研究旨在评估一种新型生物反馈呼吸训练对于实现动脉血二氧化碳分压(pCO₂)水平持续升高的可行性及潜在益处。

方法

12名哮喘患者被随机分配至立即接受为期4周治疗的治疗组或等待名单对照组。指导患者使用手持式二氧化碳监测仪调整呼吸,以改变呼气末二氧化碳分压水平。通过症状的频率和严重程度、哮喘控制情况、肺功能以及呼气峰值流速(PEF)的变异性来评估治疗效果。

结果

我们发现治疗期间及2个月随访期内,pCO₂水平稳定升高,呼吸频率降低。随访时,平均pCO₂水平从低碳酸血症范围升至正常碳酸血症范围。症状的频率和严重程度降低,报告的哮喘控制情况改善。此外,治疗组的平均PEF变异性显著降低。

结论

我们的初步干预为pCO₂生物反馈训练在哮喘患者中的可行性提供了证据。

相似文献

1
Targeting pCO(2) in asthma: pilot evaluation of a capnometry-assisted breathing training.针对哮喘中的二氧化碳分压:二氧化碳监测辅助呼吸训练的初步评估
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2007 Jun;32(2):99-109. doi: 10.1007/s10484-007-9036-8. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
2
Changes in pCO2, symptoms, and lung function of asthma patients during capnometry-assisted breathing training.哮喘患者在二氧化碳监测辅助呼吸训练期间的二氧化碳分压、症状及肺功能变化
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2009 Mar;34(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s10484-008-9070-1. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
3
Hypoventilation training for asthma: a case illustration.哮喘低通气训练:病例举例。
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2012 Mar;37(1):63-72. doi: 10.1007/s10484-011-9178-6.
4
Reversal of bronchial obstruction with bi-level positive airway pressure and nebulization in patients with acute asthma.双水平气道正压通气联合雾化吸入治疗急性哮喘患者支气管阻塞的逆转
J Asthma. 2009 May;46(4):356-61. doi: 10.1080/02770900902718829.
5
End-tidal versus transcutaneous measurement of PCO2 during voluntary hypo- and hyperventilation.在自主低通气和高通气期间,呼气末与经皮测量二氧化碳分压的比较。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Feb;71(2):103-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.07.011. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
6
Controlling asthma by training of Capnometry-Assisted Hypoventilation (CATCH) vs slow breathing: a randomized controlled trial.通过二氧化碳监测辅助低通气训练(CATCH)与慢呼吸控制哮喘:一项随机对照试验。
Chest. 2014 Nov;146(5):1237-1247. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0665.
7
A randomized, controlled study to evaluate the role of an in-home asthma disease management program provided by respiratory therapists in improving outcomes and reducing the cost of care.一项随机对照研究,旨在评估呼吸治疗师提供的家庭哮喘疾病管理项目在改善治疗效果和降低护理成本方面的作用。
J Asthma. 2009 Mar;46(2):194-201. doi: 10.1080/02770900802610068.
8
Opposing breathing therapies for panic disorder: a randomized controlled trial of lowering vs raising end-tidal P(CO₂).对立的呼吸疗法治疗惊恐障碍:降低与升高潮气末 P(CO₂)的随机对照试验。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2012 Jul;73(7):931-9. doi: 10.4088/JCP.11m07068.
9
Evaluation of yoga therapy programme for patients of bronchial asthma.支气管哮喘患者瑜伽治疗方案的评估
Singapore Med J. 1993 Aug;34(4):306-8.
10
The effect of physiotherapy-based breathing retraining on asthma control.基于物理治疗的呼吸再训练对哮喘控制的影响。
J Asthma. 2011 Aug;48(6):593-601. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.587583. Epub 2011 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinically relevant effects of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in individuals with asthma.基于正念减压疗法对哮喘患者的临床相关影响。
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2022 Sep 14;25:100509. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2022.100509. eCollection 2022 Nov.
2
Further Exploration of Treatment Response in Latinos with Comorbid Asthma and Panic Disorder: A Brief Report of HRV and ETCO2 as Potential Mediators of Treatment Response.进一步探索合并哮喘和惊恐障碍的拉丁裔患者的治疗反应:心率变异性和 ETCO2 作为治疗反应潜在中介的简要报告。
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2020 Jun;45(2):67-74. doi: 10.1007/s10484-020-09454-3.
3
Controlling asthma by training of Capnometry-Assisted Hypoventilation (CATCH) vs slow breathing: a randomized controlled trial.
通过二氧化碳监测辅助低通气训练(CATCH)与慢呼吸控制哮喘:一项随机对照试验。
Chest. 2014 Nov;146(5):1237-1247. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-0665.
4
Psychosocial factors and behavioral medicine interventions in asthma.哮喘的社会心理因素和行为医学干预。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Apr;81(2):231-50. doi: 10.1037/a0030187. Epub 2012 Oct 1.
5
Dysfunctional breathing phenotype in adults with asthma - incidence and risk factors.成人哮喘中呼吸功能障碍表型的发生率及危险因素。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2012 Sep 19;2(1):18. doi: 10.1186/2045-7022-2-18.
6
Local incentive spirometry improves peak expiratory flow rate in teenage sickle cell anaemia patients: a randomized pilot trial.局部激励肺活量测定法可提高青少年镰状细胞贫血患者的呼气峰值流速:一项随机试点试验。
Afr Health Sci. 2011 Sep;11(3):303-8.
7
Hypoventilation training for asthma: a case illustration.哮喘低通气训练:病例举例。
Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2012 Mar;37(1):63-72. doi: 10.1007/s10484-011-9178-6.
8
Hyperventilation in panic disorder and asthma: empirical evidence and clinical strategies.惊恐障碍和哮喘中的过度通气:实证证据和临床策略。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2010 Oct;78(1):68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 May 25.