• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[国家质量水平——护理与照护质量发展的多学科策略]

[National quality levels - multidisciplinary strategies on quality development in nursing and care].

作者信息

Beikirch E, Klie T

机构信息

Evangelische Fachhochschule Freiburg, Bugginger Str. 38, 79114 Freiburg.

出版信息

Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2007 Jun;40(3):147-57. doi: 10.1007/s00391-007-0461-3.

DOI:10.1007/s00391-007-0461-3
PMID:17565433
Abstract

Whereas healthcare quality assurance measures were to a large extent legally institutionalised by health insurance reforms undertaken during the 1990s, the field of nursing and care was not widely affected. In this area, state of the art clauses, in particular with regard to multidisciplinary service ranges, commonly still remain empty. National quality levels, developed as multidisciplinary nursing and care quality determinations, for the first time meet quality science criteria for in-patient treatment both exemplarily and in daily practice. In this article, the methodical approach as well as excerpts from the quality level on mobility and safety are demonstrated. The conclusion drawn implies the systematic implementation and evaluation of national quality levels as well as understanding multidisciplinary quality levels as a public task in terms of establishment and institutionalisation.

摘要

尽管20世纪90年代进行的医疗保险改革在很大程度上已将医疗保健质量保证措施合法化,但护理和照料领域并未受到广泛影响。在这一领域,关于多学科服务范围等方面的最新条款通常仍然空白。作为多学科护理和照料质量判定而制定的国家质量水平,首次在范例和日常实践中都符合住院治疗的质量科学标准。本文展示了方法路径以及移动性和安全性方面质量水平的节选内容。得出的结论意味着要系统地实施和评估国家质量水平,并将多学科质量水平理解为在确立和制度化方面的一项公共任务。

相似文献

1
[National quality levels - multidisciplinary strategies on quality development in nursing and care].[国家质量水平——护理与照护质量发展的多学科策略]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2007 Jun;40(3):147-57. doi: 10.1007/s00391-007-0461-3.
2
[Quality certificate "Geriatrie" from the care scientist's perspective].[从护理科学家视角看“老年医学”质量证书]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2007 Jun;40(3):141-6. doi: 10.1007/s00391-007-0459-x.
3
[The seal of quality in geriatrics].[老年医学中的质量标志]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2007 Jun;40(3):137-40. doi: 10.1007/s00391-007-0456-0.
4
[Quality assurance in geriatrics and nursing. A multidisciplinary challenge].
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2007 Jun;40(3):135-6. doi: 10.1007/s00391-007-0460-4.
5
[Introduction of the National Expert Standard in nursing: possibilities, opportunities and limits in adoption].[护理领域国家专家标准介绍:采用过程中的可能性、机遇与局限]
Pflege Z. 2008 Mar;61(3):162-5.
6
Improving patient care for the elderly through a geriatric consultation team.
Perspectives. 1986 Winter;10(4):11-2.
7
The generation gain.世代增益。
Nurs Stand. 2003;18(4):96. doi: 10.7748/ns2003.10.18.4.96.c3470.
8
Aged care under siege.老年护理面临困境。
Aust Nurs J. 2000 Sep;8(3):22-4.
9
Sharing good practice in the care of older people.分享老年人护理方面的良好做法。
Nurs Times. 2002;98(32):42-4.
10
[Quality assurance in geriatric care].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1994 Sep 10;114(21):2534.

本文引用的文献

1
From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care.从最佳证据到最佳实践:有效实施患者护理变革。
Lancet. 2003 Oct 11;362(9391):1225-30. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14546-1.