Daeppen Jean-Bernard, Gaume Jacques, Bady Pierre, Yersin Bertrand, Calmes Jean-Marie, Givel Jean-Claude, Gmel Gerhard
Emergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Addiction. 2007 Aug;102(8):1224-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01869.x. Epub 2007 Jun 12.
To evaluate the effectiveness of brief alcohol intervention (BAI) in reducing alcohol use among hazardous drinkers treated in the emergency department (ED) after an injury; in addition it tests whether assessment of alcohol use without BAI is sufficient to reduce hazardous drinking.
Randomized controlled clinical trial with 12-month follow-up conducted between January 2003 and June 2005.
Urban academic emergency department (ED) of the Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
A total of 5136 consecutive patients attending ED after an injury completed a seven-item general and a three-item alcohol screen and 1472 (28.7%) were positive for hazardous drinking according to the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Addiction definition; of these 987 (67.1%) were randomized into a BAI group (n = 310) or a control group with screening and assessment (n = 342) or a control group with screening only (n = 335) and then a total of 770 patients (78.0%) completed the 12-month follow-up procedures.
A single 10-15-minute session of standardized BAI conducted by a trained research assistant.
Percentage of participants who have changed to low-risk drinking at follow-up.
Data obtained at 12 months indicated that similar proportions were low-risk drinkers in BAI versus control groups with and without assessment (35.6%, 34.0%, 37.0%, respectively, P = 0.71). Data also indicated similar reductions in drinking frequency, quantity, binge drinking frequency and Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) scores across groups. All groups reported similar numbers of days hospitalized and numbers of medical consults in the last 12 months. A model including age groups, gender, AUDIT and injury severity scores indicated that BAI had no influence on the main alcohol use outcome.
This study provides the evidence that a 10-15-minute BAI does not decrease alcohol use and health resource utilization in hazardous drinkers treated in the ED, and demonstrates that commonly found decreases in hazardous alcohol use in control groups cannot be attributed to the baseline alcohol assessment.
评估简短酒精干预(BAI)在减少急诊科(ED)因伤就诊的危险饮酒者酒精使用方面的有效性;此外,测试不进行BAI的酒精使用评估是否足以减少危险饮酒。
2003年1月至2005年6月进行的为期12个月随访的随机对照临床试验。
瑞士洛桑大学医院的城市学术急诊科(ED)。
共有5136名因伤后连续就诊于急诊科的患者完成了一项七项通用和一项三项酒精筛查,根据美国国立酒精滥用与酒精中毒研究所的定义,1472名(28.7%)危险饮酒检测呈阳性;其中987名(67.1%)被随机分为BAI组(n = 310)、筛查与评估对照组(n = 342)或仅筛查对照组(n = 335),然后共有770名患者(78.0%)完成了12个月的随访程序。
由一名经过培训的研究助理进行一次10 - 15分钟的标准化BAI。
随访时转变为低风险饮酒的参与者百分比。
12个月时获得的数据表明,在进行BAI的组与有评估和无评估的对照组中,低风险饮酒者的比例相似(分别为35.6%、34.0%、37.0%,P = 0.71)。数据还表明,各组在饮酒频率、饮酒量、暴饮频率和酒精使用障碍识别测试(AUDIT)分数方面的降低相似。所有组报告的过去12个月住院天数和医疗咨询次数相似。一个包括年龄组、性别、AUDIT和损伤严重程度评分的模型表明,BAI对主要酒精使用结果没有影响。
本研究提供的证据表明,10 - 15分钟的BAI不会降低急诊科治疗的危险饮酒者的酒精使用和卫生资源利用,并表明对照组中常见的危险酒精使用减少不能归因于基线酒精评估。