• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会推理矫正中的文化差异:倾向性反弹会在相互依存的文化中出现吗?

Cultural differences in the correction of social inferences: Does the dispositional rebound occur in an interdependent culture?

作者信息

Geeraert Nicolas, Yzerbyt Vincent Y

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Essex, wivenhoe Park, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;46(Pt 2):423-35. doi: 10.1348/014466606X162062.

DOI:10.1348/014466606X162062
PMID:17565790
Abstract

Although social observers have been found to rely heavily on dispositions in their causal analysis, it has been proposed that culture strongly affects this tendency. Recent research has shown that suppressing dispositional inferences during social judgment can lead to a dispositional rebound, that is relying more on dispositional information in subsequent judgments. In the present research, we investigated whether culture also affects this rebound tendency. First, Thai and Belgian participants took part in a typical attitude attribution paradigm. Next, dispositional rebound was assessed by having participants describe a series of pictures. The dispositional rebound occurred for both Belgian and Thai participants when confronted with a forced target, but disappeared for Thai participants when the situational constraints of the target were made salient. The findings are discussed in light of the current cultural models of attribution theory.

摘要

尽管社会观察者在因果分析中被发现严重依赖性格因素,但有人提出文化会强烈影响这种倾向。最近的研究表明,在社会判断过程中抑制性格推断会导致性格反弹,即在随后的判断中更多地依赖性格信息。在本研究中,我们调查了文化是否也会影响这种反弹倾向。首先,泰国和比利时的参与者参与了一个典型的态度归因范式。接下来,通过让参与者描述一系列图片来评估性格反弹。当面对一个强制目标时,比利时和泰国的参与者都出现了性格反弹,但当目标的情境限制变得显著时,泰国参与者的性格反弹消失了。我们根据当前归因理论的文化模型对研究结果进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Cultural differences in the correction of social inferences: Does the dispositional rebound occur in an interdependent culture?社会推理矫正中的文化差异:倾向性反弹会在相互依存的文化中出现吗?
Br J Soc Psychol. 2007 Jun;46(Pt 2):423-35. doi: 10.1348/014466606X162062.
2
The dispositional inference strikes back: situational focus and dispositional suppression in causal attribution.特质归因的反击:因果归因中的情境聚焦与特质抑制
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 Sep;81(3):365-76. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.81.3.365.
3
On difficult questions and evident answers: dispositional inference from role-constrained behavior.关于难题与明显答案:基于角色约束行为的特质推断
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Nov;29(11):1459-75. doi: 10.1177/0146167203256375.
4
Culture, theory-of-mind, and morality: How independent and interdependent minds make moral judgments.文化、心理理论和道德:独立和相互依存的思维如何做出道德判断。
Biol Psychol. 2022 Oct;174:108423. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108423. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
5
Behavior identification as a mediator of dispositional inference.作为特质推断中介因素的行为识别
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Dec;61(6):873-83. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.61.6.873.
6
Downstream Effects of Dispositional Inferences on Confirmation Biases.性格推理对确认偏差的下游影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2019 Apr;45(4):557-570. doi: 10.1177/0146167218789624. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
7
Cultural variation in correspondence bias: the critical role of attitude diagnosticity of socially constrained behavior.对应偏差中的文化差异:社会约束行为态度诊断性的关键作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Nov;83(5):1239-48.
8
Processing alternative explanations of behavior: correction or integration?处理行为的其他解释:纠正还是整合?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Sep;79(3):344-54. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.3.344.
9
Predicting responsibility judgments from dispositional inferences and causal attributions.从性格推断和因果归因预测责任判断。
Cogn Psychol. 2021 Sep;129:101412. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101412. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
10
The appraisal rebound effect: cognitive appraisals on the rebound.评估反弹效应:认知评估的反弹
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Sep;35(9):1208-19. doi: 10.1177/0146167209338073. Epub 2009 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Individual differences in situation awareness: validation of the situationism scale.态势感知中的个体差异:态势主义量表的验证
J Soc Psychol. 2015 Mar-Apr;155(2):143-62. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2014.977762. Epub 2015 Jan 20.