Yap Andy J, Tong Eddie M W
Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Sep;35(9):1208-19. doi: 10.1177/0146167209338073. Epub 2009 Jul 1.
Although there have been many demonstrations of ironic thought processes, no demonstration to date has examined the effect of suppressing appraisals. Ironic phenomena in this domain have tremendous theoretical and practical importance to person perception, trait attribution, and social cognition in general. The authors propose the appraisal rebound hypothesis, which states that the suppression of an appraisal paradoxically activates it. Appraisal rebound was demonstrated across three studies with three different appraisals: unfairness, agency-others, and perceived control. The appraisal rebound effect was also found to be specific only to the suppressed appraisal. These results add to the growing literature on the many ways in which ironic mental processes affect daily thinking and feeling. Specifically, the findings are discussed with regard to emotion regulation, normal chronic emotionality, and psychopathology.
尽管已经有许多关于反讽思维过程的论证,但迄今为止,尚无论证考察过抑制评价的效果。这一领域的反讽现象对于人物感知、特质归因以及一般意义上的社会认知具有巨大的理论和实践重要性。作者们提出了评价反弹假说,该假说认为,对一种评价的抑制会自相矛盾地激活它。在三项研究中针对三种不同的评价(不公平、他人能动性和感知到的控制)证明了评价反弹。还发现评价反弹效应仅特定于被抑制的评价。这些结果为有关反讽心理过程影响日常思维和感受的多种方式的不断增多的文献增添了内容。具体而言,将结合情绪调节、正常慢性情绪状态和精神病理学对这些发现进行讨论。