Valentine William J, Erny-Albrecht K M, Ray J A, Roze S, Cobden D, Palmer A J
CORE, Centre for Outcomes Research, a unit of IMS, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Adv Ther. 2007 Mar-Apr;24(2):273-90. doi: 10.1007/BF02849895.
The aim of this study was to gain a preliminary indication of the long-term clinical and economic implications of converting treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes to insulin detemir+/-oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs) in a routine clinical practice setting in the United States. With the use of outcome data and patient characteristics reported from an ongoing prospective observational trial, a validated computer simulation model of diabetes was used to project the clinical and cost outcomes associated with therapy conversion to insulin detemir over a 35-y period from (1) OHA only, (2) neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin (NPH)+/-OHA, and (3) insulin glargine+/-OHA. Cost-effectiveness was assessed from a third-party healthcare payer perspective for the year 2005. Costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at a rate of 3%. Treatment with insulin detemir+/-OHA was associated with increases in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.309, 0.350, and 0.333 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) versus treatment with OHA alone, NPH+/-OHA, and insulin glargine+/-OHA, respectively. Increases in pharmacy costs were partially offset by reduced complications, rticularly renal complications and neuropathy. Projected incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were well within the range considered to represent good value in the United States, at $7412, $6269, and $3951 per QALY gained for treatment with Idet+/-OHA versus OHA alone, NPH+/-OHA, and Iglarg+/-OHA, respectively. On the basis of preliminary evidence of short-term improvements in glycemic control and reduced hypoglycemia, therapy conversion to insulin detemir+/-OHA from OHA alone, NPH+/-OHA, or insulin glargine+/-OHA was projected to increase quality-adjusted life expectancy and to represent a cost-effective treatment option in the United States.
本研究的目的是在美国常规临床实践环境中,初步了解将2型糖尿病患者的治疗转换为地特胰岛素加/减口服降糖药(OHAs)的长期临床和经济影响。利用一项正在进行的前瞻性观察性试验报告的结局数据和患者特征,使用经过验证的糖尿病计算机模拟模型,预测从(1)仅使用OHA、(2)中性鱼精蛋白锌胰岛素(NPH)加/减OHA以及(3)甘精胰岛素加/减OHA转换为地特胰岛素治疗在35年期间的临床和成本结局。从第三方医疗保健支付者的角度评估了2005年的成本效益。成本和临床结局按3%的贴现率进行贴现。与单独使用OHA、NPH加/减OHA以及甘精胰岛素加/减OHA治疗相比,地特胰岛素加/减OHA治疗分别使质量调整生命预期增加了0.309、0.350和0.333个质量调整生命年(QALYs)。药房成本的增加被并发症减少所部分抵消,尤其是肾脏并发症和神经病变。预计增量成本效益比在美国被认为代表良好价值的范围内,地特胰岛素加/减OHA治疗与单独使用OHA、NPH加/减OHA以及甘精胰岛素加/减OHA治疗相比,每获得一个QALY的成本分别为7412美元、6269美元和3951美元。基于血糖控制短期改善和低血糖减少的初步证据,预计从单独使用OHA、NPH加/减OHA或甘精胰岛素加/减OHA转换为地特胰岛素加/减OHA治疗可提高质量调整生命预期,并在美国代表一种具有成本效益的治疗选择。