Suppr超能文献

对加拿大 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者使用甘精胰岛素和地特胰岛素的终生成本进行建模:荟萃分析和成本最小化分析。

Modeling the lifetime costs of insulin glargine and insulin detemir in type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients in Canada: a meta-analysis and a cost-minimization analysis.

机构信息

IMS Health, London, UK.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2011;14(2):207-16. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2011.561390. Epub 2011 Mar 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Two basal insulin analogues, insulin glargine once daily and insulin detemir once or twice daily, are marketed in Canada.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the long-term costs of insulin glargine once daily (QD) versus insulin detemir once or twice daily (QD or BID) for type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 (T2DM) diabetes mellitus from a Canadian provincial government's perspective.

METHODS

A cost-minimization analysis comparing insulin glargine (IGlarg) to insulin detemir (IDet) was conducted using a validated computer simulation model, the CORE Diabetes Model. Lifetime direct medical costs including costs of insulin treatment and diabetes complications were projected. T1DM and T2DM patients' daily insulin dose (T1DM: IGlarg QD 26.2 IU; IDet BID 33.6 IU; T2DM: IGlarg QD 47.2 IU; IDet QD 65.7 IU or IDet BID 80.4 IU) was derived from a meta-analysis of randomized trials. All patients were assumed to stay on the same treatment for life. Costs were discounted at 5% per annum and reported in 2010 Canadian Dollars.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis showed T1DM and T2DM patients had similar HbA(1c) change from baseline when receiving IGlarg compared to IDet (T1DM: 0.002%-points; p = 0.97; T2DM: -0.05%-points; p = 0.28). Treatment of T1DM patients with IGlarg versus IDet BID resulted in lifetime cost savings of $4231 per patient. Treatment of T2DM patients with IGlarg resulted in lifetime cost savings of $4659 per patient versus IDet QD and cost savings of $8709 per patient versus IDet BID.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar HbA(1c) change from baseline can be achieved with a lower IGlarg than IDet dose. From the perspective of a Canadian provincial government, treatment of T1DM and T2DM patients with IGlarg instead of IDet can generate long-term cost savings. Main limitations include trial data were derived from multi-country studies rather than the Canadian population and self-monitoring blood glucose costs were not included.

摘要

背景

在加拿大,有两种基础胰岛素类似物,即每日一次的甘精胰岛素和每日一次或两次的地特胰岛素。

目的

从加拿大省级政府的角度出发,估算每日一次注射的甘精胰岛素(QD)与每日一次或两次注射的地特胰岛素(QD 或 BID)治疗 1 型(T1DM)和 2 型(T2DM)糖尿病的长期成本。

方法

使用经过验证的计算机模拟模型——CORE 糖尿病模型,对甘精胰岛素(IGlarg)与地特胰岛素(IDet)进行成本最小化分析。预测了终生直接医疗费用,包括胰岛素治疗和糖尿病并发症的费用。T1DM 和 T2DM 患者的每日胰岛素剂量(T1DM:IGlarg QD 26.2IU;IDet BID 33.6IU;T2DM:IGlarg QD 47.2IU;IDet QD 65.7IU 或 IDet BID 80.4IU)来自于一项随机试验的荟萃分析。所有患者均假设终生使用同一种治疗药物。费用按每年 5%贴现,并以 2010 加元报告。

结果

荟萃分析显示,与地特胰岛素相比,T1DM 和 T2DM 患者使用甘精胰岛素治疗后,HbA1c 自基线的变化相似(T1DM:0.002%;p=0.97;T2DM:-0.05%;p=0.28)。与地特胰岛素 BID 相比,T1DM 患者使用甘精胰岛素治疗可节省终生每位患者 4231 加元的费用。与地特胰岛素 QD 相比,T2DM 患者使用甘精胰岛素治疗可节省终生每位患者 4659 加元的费用,与地特胰岛素 BID 相比,可节省每位患者 8709 加元的费用。

结论

与地特胰岛素相比,较低剂量的甘精胰岛素可实现相似的 HbA1c 自基线的变化。从加拿大省级政府的角度来看,使用甘精胰岛素治疗 T1DM 和 T2DM 患者可带来长期成本节省。主要局限性包括:试验数据来自多国研究,而非加拿大人群,并且未包括自我监测血糖的费用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验