Xia Shu-Jie, Zhuo Jian, Sun Xiao-Wen, Han Bang-Min, Shao Yi, Zhang Yi-Nan
Department of Urology, First People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200080, China.
Eur Urol. 2008 Feb;53(2):382-89. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.05.019. Epub 2007 Jun 4.
Thulium laser resection of the prostate-tangerine technique (TmLRP-TT) is a transurethral procedure that uses thulium laser fiber to dissect whole prostatic lobes off the surgical capsule, similar to peeling a tangerine. To our knowledge we report the first prospective, randomized study comparing TmLRP-TT and standard TURP for symptomatic BPH.
From November 2004 to December 2005, 100 consecutive BPH patients were randomized for surgical treatment with TmLRP-TT (n=52) or TURP (n=48). All patients were preoperatively assessed with subjective symptoms score, International Index of Erectile Function questionnaire, and complete urodynamic evaluation. Preoperative and perioperative parameters at 1-, 6-, and 12-mo follow-up were also evaluated. All complications were recorded.
TmLRP-TT was significantly superior to TURP in terms of catheterization time (45.7+/-25.8h vs. 87.4+/-33.8h, p<0.0001), hospital stay (115.1+/-25.5h vs. 161.1+/-33.8h, p<0.0001), and drop in hemoglobin (0.92+/-0.82 g/dl vs. 1.46+/-0.65 g/dl, p<0.001), whereas it required equivalent time to perform (46.3+/-16.2 vs. 50.4+/-20.7 min, p>0.05). TmLRP-TT and TURP resulted in a significant improvement from baseline in terms of subjective symptoms scoring and urodynamic finding, but no significant difference was found between the two groups. Late complications were also comparable.
TmLRP-TT is an almost bloodless procedure with high efficacy and little perioperative morbidity. TmLRP-TT is superior to TURP in safety and is as efficacious as TURP in 1-yr follow-up. It is a promising technology in the clinical practice field.
铥激光前列腺切除术——蜜橘技术(TmLRP-TT)是一种经尿道手术,使用铥激光光纤将整个前列腺叶从外科包膜上剥离,类似于剥蜜橘。据我们所知,我们报告了第一项比较TmLRP-TT和标准经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)治疗有症状良性前列腺增生(BPH)的前瞻性随机研究。
2004年11月至2005年12月,100例连续的BPH患者被随机分为接受TmLRP-TT手术治疗组(n = 52)或TURP手术治疗组(n = 48)。所有患者术前均进行主观症状评分、国际勃起功能指数问卷评估及完整的尿动力学评估。还评估了术前及术后1个月、6个月和12个月随访时的围手术期参数。记录所有并发症。
在导尿时间(45.7±25.8小时对87.4±33.8小时,p<0.0001)、住院时间(115.1±25.5小时对161.1±33.8小时,p<0.0001)和血红蛋白下降幅度(0.92±0.82 g/dl对1.46±0.65 g/dl,p<0.001)方面,TmLRP-TT显著优于TURP,而手术所需时间相当(46.3±16.2对50.4±20.7分钟,p>0.05)。TmLRP-TT和TURP在主观症状评分和尿动力学检查结果方面均较基线有显著改善,但两组间无显著差异。晚期并发症也相当。
TmLRP-TT几乎是一种无血手术,疗效高,围手术期发病率低。TmLRP-TT在安全性上优于TURP,在1年随访中与TURP疗效相当。它是临床实践领域一项有前景的技术。