Suppr超能文献

N 比值在胃癌患者中的预后价值:在大型多中心队列中的验证

The prognostic value of N-ratio in patients with gastric cancer: validation in a large, multicenter series.

作者信息

Marchet A, Mocellin S, Ambrosi A, de Manzoni G, Di Leo A, Marrelli D, Roviello F, Morgagni P, Saragoni L, Natalini G, De Santis F, Baiocchi L, Coniglio A, Nitti D

机构信息

Clinica Chirurgica II, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008 Feb;34(2):159-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2007.04.018. Epub 2007 Jun 13.

Abstract

AIMS

The proportion between metastatic and examined lymph nodes (N-ratio) has been proposed as an independent prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer. In the present work we validated the reliability of N-ratio in a large, multicenter series.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of 1853 patients who underwent radical resection for gastric carcinoma. Survival of patients with >15 (Group-1, n=1421) and those with < or =15 (Group-2, n=432) lymph nodes examined was separately analyzed in order to evaluate the influence of lymph node dissection on disease staging. N-ratio categories (N-ratio 0, 0%; N-ratio 1, 1-9%; N-ratio 2, 10-25%; N-ratio 3, >25%) were determined by the best cut-off approach.

RESULTS

At multivariate analysis, N-ratio (but not TNM N-category) was retained as an independent prognostic factor both in Group-1 and Group-2 (HR for N-ratio 1, N-ratio 2 and N-ratio 3=1.67, 2.96 and 6.59, and 1.56, 2.68 and 4.28, respectively). After a median follow-up of 45.5 months, the 5-year overall survival rates of TNM N0, N1 and N2 patients were significantly different in Group-1 vs Group-2. This was not the case when adopting the N-ratio classification, suggesting that a low number of excised lymph nodes can lead to patients being understaged using the N-category, but not N-ratio. Moreover, N-ratio identified subsets of patients with significantly different survival rates within TNM N1 and N2 categories in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

N-ratio is a simple and reproducible prognostic tool that can stratify patients with gastric cancer, including those cases with limited lymph node dissection. These data support the rationale to propose the implementation of N-ratio into the current TNM staging system.

摘要

目的

转移淋巴结与检查淋巴结的比例(N 比值)已被提出作为胃癌患者的独立预后因素。在本研究中,我们在一个大型多中心系列研究中验证了 N 比值的可靠性。

患者和方法

我们回顾性分析了 1853 例行胃癌根治性切除术患者的数据。分别分析检查淋巴结数>15 个的患者(第 1 组,n = 1421)和检查淋巴结数≤15 个的患者(第 2 组,n = 432)的生存情况,以评估淋巴结清扫对疾病分期的影响。N 比值类别(N 比值 0,0%;N 比值 1,1 - 9%;N 比值 2,10 - 25%;N 比值 3,>25%)通过最佳截断点法确定。

结果

在多因素分析中,N 比值(而非 TNM N 分期类别)在第 1 组和第 2 组中均被保留为独立预后因素(N 比值 1、N 比值 2 和 N 比值 3 的风险比分别为 1.67、2.96 和 6.59,以及 1.56、2.68 和 4.28)。中位随访 45.5 个月后,第 1 组与第 2 组中 TNM N0、N1 和 N2 患者的 5 年总生存率存在显著差异。采用 N 比值分类时情况并非如此,这表明切除淋巴结数量较少会导致使用 N 分期类别对患者分期不足,但使用 N 比值则不会。此外,N 比值在两组的 TNM N1 和 N2 类别中均识别出了生存率显著不同的患者亚组。

结论

N 比值是一种简单且可重复的预后工具,可对胃癌患者进行分层,包括那些淋巴结清扫有限的病例。这些数据支持将 N 比值纳入当前 TNM 分期系统的合理性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验