Suppr超能文献

腰椎和腰骶椎的环形融合。两种前路脊柱融合技术的比较。

Circumferential fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. Comparison of two techniques of anterior spinal fusion.

作者信息

Grob D, Scheier H J, Dvorak J

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Schulthess Hospital Zürich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Chir Organi Mov. 1991 Apr-Jun;76(2):123-31.

PMID:1756672
Abstract

Thirty-two patients with therapy-resistant low-back pain and justified indication for fusion were divided into two groups: 16 patients were treated with anterior fusion of the lumbosacral spine, with insertion of tricortical bone grafts of the iliac crest, and 16 patients with insertion of a fibular peg. Additional dorsal fusion of the same segments was performed. Comparison of the two techniques of circumferential fusion of the lumbosacral joint reveals comparable clinical results. A marked difference in roentgenographical criteria such as disk height, retrolisthesis, and anterior osteophytes in the adjacent segment between the two techniques was noted at the time of follow-up evaluation after 89 months and motivated the authors to abandon the fibular-peg technique.

摘要

32例对治疗有抵抗性的下腰痛且有合理融合指征的患者被分为两组:16例患者接受腰骶部前路融合术,植入髂嵴三面皮质骨移植块,16例患者植入腓骨栓。对相同节段进行了额外的后路融合。腰骶关节两种环形融合技术的比较显示出相当的临床结果。在89个月后的随访评估时,注意到两种技术在相邻节段的椎间盘高度、椎体后滑脱和前缘骨赘等X线标准上存在显著差异,这促使作者放弃了腓骨栓技术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验