Manrique Amapola, Rusert Peter, Joos Beda, Fischer Marek, Kuster Herbert, Leemann Christine, Niederöst Barbara, Weber Rainer, Stiegler Gabriela, Katinger Hermann, Günthard Huldrych F, Trkola Alexandra
Division of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
J Virol. 2007 Aug;81(16):8793-808. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00598-07. Epub 2007 Jun 13.
Recently, passive immunization of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected individuals with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) 2G12, 2F5, and 4E10 provided evidence of the in vivo activity of 2G12 but raised concerns about the function of the two membrane-proximal external region (MPER)-specific MAbs (A. Trkola, H. Kuster, P. Rusert, B. Joos, M. Fischer, C. Leemann, A. Manrique, M. Huber, M. Rehr, A. Oxenius, R. Weber, G. Stiegler, B. Vcelar, H. Katinger, L. Aceto, and H. F. Gunthard, Nat. Med. 11:615-622, 2005). In the light of MPER-targeting vaccines under development, we performed an in-depth analysis of the emergence of mutations conferring resistance to these three MAbs to further elucidate their activity. Clonal analysis of the MPER of plasma virus samples derived during antibody treatment confirmed that no changes in this region had occurred in vivo. Sequence analysis of the 2G12 epitope relevant N-glycosylation sites of viruses derived from 13 patients during the trial supported the phenotypic evaluation, demonstrating that mutations in these sites are associated with resistance. In vitro selection experiments with isolates of four of these individuals corroborated the in vivo finding that virus strains rapidly escape 2G12 pressure. Notably, in vitro resistance mutations differed, in most cases, from those found in vivo. Importantly, in vitro selection with 2F5 and 4E10 demonstrated that resistance to these MAbs can be difficult to achieve and can lead to selection of variants with impaired infectivity. This remarkable vulnerability of the virus to interference within the MPER calls for a further evaluation of the safety and efficacy of MPER-targeting therapeutic and vaccination strategies.
最近,用单克隆抗体(MAb)2G12、2F5和4E10对人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染个体进行被动免疫,证明了2G12的体内活性,但也引发了对两种膜近端外部区域(MPER)特异性单克隆抗体功能的担忧(A. 特科拉、H. 库斯特、P. 鲁泽特、B. 约斯、M. 菲舍尔、C. 利曼、A. 曼里克、M. 胡贝尔、M. 雷尔、A. 奥克西纽斯、R. 韦伯、G. 施蒂格勒、B. 韦克拉尔、H. 卡廷格、L. 阿塞托和H. F. 贡塔尔德,《自然医学》11:615 - 622,2005年)。鉴于正在研发的靶向MPER的疫苗,我们对赋予这三种单克隆抗体抗性的突变的出现进行了深入分析,以进一步阐明它们的活性。对抗体治疗期间获得的血浆病毒样本的MPER进行克隆分析证实,该区域在体内未发生变化。对试验期间13名患者的病毒中与2G12表位相关的N - 糖基化位点进行序列分析,支持了表型评估,表明这些位点的突变与抗性相关。对其中四人的分离株进行的体外选择实验证实了体内的发现,即病毒株能迅速逃避2G12的压力。值得注意的是,体外抗性突变在大多数情况下与体内发现的不同。重要的是,用2F5和4E10进行的体外选择表明,对这些单克隆抗体产生抗性可能很困难,并且可能导致选择感染性受损的变体。病毒在MPER内对干扰的这种显著易感性要求对靶向MPER的治疗和疫苗接种策略的安全性和有效性进行进一步评估。