Mascia Luciana, Zavala Elisabeth, Bosma Karen, Pasero Daniela, Decaroli Daniela, Andrews Peter, Isnardi Donatella, Davi Alessandra, Arguis Maria Jose, Berardino Maurizio, Ducati Alessandro
Dipartimento di Anestesiologia e Rianimazione, Universitàdi Torino, Ospedale S. Giovanni Battista, Torino, Italy.
Crit Care Med. 2007 Aug;35(8):1815-20. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000275269.77467.DF.
Although a significant number of patients with severe brain injury develop acute lung injury, only intracranial risk factors have previously been studied. We investigated the role of extracranial predisposing factors, including hemodynamic and ventilatory management, as independent predictors of acute lung injury in brain-injured patients.
Prospective multicenter observational study.
Four European intensive care units in university-affiliated hospitals.
Eighty-six severely brain-injured patients enrolled in 13 months.
None.
All patients with severe brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score <9) were studied for 8 days from admission. Ventilatory pattern, respiratory system compliance, blood gas analysis, and hemodynamic profile were recorded and entered in a stepwise regression model. Length of stay in the intensive care unit, ventilator-free days, and mortality were collected. Eighteen patients (22%) developed acute lung injury on day 2.8 +/- 1. They were initially ventilated with significantly higher tidal volume per predicted body weight (9.5 +/- 1 vs. 10.4 +/- 1.1), respiratory rate, and minute ventilation and more often required vasoactive drugs (p < .05). In addition to a lower Pao2/Fio2 (odds ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.98-0.99), the use of high tidal volume (odds ratio 5.4, 95% confidence interval 1.54-19.24) and relatively high respiratory rate (odds ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.13-2.86) were independent predictors of acute lung injury (p < .01). After the onset of acute lung injury, patients remained ventilated with similar tidal volumes to maintain mild hypocapnia and had a longer length of stay in the intensive care unit and fewer ventilator-free days (p < .05).
In addition to a lower Pao2/Fio2, the use of high tidal volume and high respiratory rate are independent predictors of acute lung injury in patients with severe brain injury. In this patient population, alternative ventilator strategies should be considered to protect the lung and guarantee a tight CO2 control.
虽然大量重度脑损伤患者会发生急性肺损伤,但此前仅对颅内危险因素进行了研究。我们调查了颅外诱发因素的作用,包括血流动力学和通气管理,作为脑损伤患者急性肺损伤的独立预测因素。
前瞻性多中心观察性研究。
四所大学附属医院的欧洲重症监护病房。
13个月内纳入86例重度脑损伤患者。
无。
所有重度脑损伤患者(格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分<9)自入院起研究8天。记录通气模式、呼吸系统顺应性、血气分析和血流动力学参数,并纳入逐步回归模型。收集重症监护病房住院时间、无呼吸机天数和死亡率。18例患者(22%)在第2.8±1天发生急性肺损伤。他们最初每预测体重的潮气量(9.5±1对10.4±1.1)、呼吸频率和分钟通气量显著更高,且更常需要血管活性药物(p<0.05)。除了较低的动脉血氧分压/吸入氧浓度(优势比0.98,95%置信区间0.98 - 0.99)外,大潮气量的使用(优势比5.4,95%置信区间1.54 - 19.24)和相对较高的呼吸频率(优势比1.8,95%置信区间1.13 - 2.86)是急性肺损伤的独立预测因素(p<0.01)。急性肺损伤发生后,患者以相似的潮气量通气以维持轻度低碳酸血症,在重症监护病房的住院时间更长,无呼吸机天数更少(p<0.05)。
除了较低的动脉血氧分压/吸入氧浓度外,大潮气量和高呼吸频率的使用是重度脑损伤患者急性肺损伤的独立预测因素。对于这类患者,应考虑采用替代通气策略以保护肺并确保严格控制二氧化碳。