Weigel Ronald M, Nucera Daniele, Qiao Baozhen, Teferedegne Belete, Suh Dong Kyun, Barber David A, Bahnson Peter B, Isaacson Richard E, White Bryan A
Department of Pathobiology, University of Illinois, 2001 South Lincoln Avenue, Urbana, IL 61802, USA.
Prev Vet Med. 2007 Oct 16;81(4):274-89. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.04.020. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
An ecological model for transmission of Salmonella enterica in swine production ecosystems was developed, identifying host species, environmental reservoirs, and temporal, spatial, and functional (i.e., stage of production) dimensions. It was hypothesized that transmission was most likely within spatial and functional compartments, between hosts of the same species and abiotic compartments of the same type. Eighteen swine production systems in Illinois, USA, were sampled in four collection cycles (1998, 1999, 2000, 2003). There were 11,873 samples collected, including feces from swine and other mammals and birds, and samples from insects, pen floors, boots, feed, and water. The 460 Salmonella isolates obtained were genotyped using repetitive sequence PCR with three primers-REP, BOX, and ERIC. All isolates from 2000 and 2003 were serotyped, as well as a subsample from 1998 and 1998. Genetic relatedness was estimated from the similarity of fragmentation patterns after gel electrophoresis of PCR products. Cluster analysis identified genetically related isolates. Linking of isolates in tight clusters (similarity >or=85%) was viewed as evidence for transmission. Five farms had a sufficient number of tight clusters for hypothesis testing. The factors most differentiating isolates genetically were farm of origin and time of sampling. Isolates were also differentiated genetically by site, building, room, and pen. There was no consistent association of genotype with stage of production or host/environment reservoir. Serotype analysis confirmed that Salmonella lineages were differentiated by visit and site. Thus, Salmonella transmission was primarily over short distances, i.e., within the same pen or room, with some transmission between rooms and buildings on the same site, but with limited transmission between sites. Transmission was observed across a variety of ecological niches represented by different host species and environmental reservoirs. Genetic differences over time reflected multiple introductions into the ecosystem of different Salmonella genotypes, as well as evolutionary changes within lineages. Intervention strategies to reduce Salmonella prevalence within swine production ecosystems would be best targeted at maintaining spatial barriers to transmission, whereas intervention targeted at specific biological hosts or environmental reservoirs is less likely to be effective.
构建了一个用于描述猪生产生态系统中肠炎沙门氏菌传播的生态模型,确定了宿主物种、环境储存库以及时间、空间和功能(即生产阶段)维度。研究假设认为,传播最有可能发生在空间和功能分区内,同一物种的宿主之间以及同一类型的非生物分区之间。在美国伊利诺伊州,对18个猪生产系统进行了四个采集周期(1998年、1999年、2000年、2003年)的采样。共采集了11,873个样本,包括猪、其他哺乳动物和鸟类的粪便,以及昆虫、猪栏地面、靴子、饲料和水的样本。使用重复序列PCR和三种引物(REP、BOX和ERIC)对获得的460株沙门氏菌分离株进行基因分型。对2000年和2003年的所有分离株以及1998年和1999年的一个子样本进行了血清分型。通过PCR产物凝胶电泳后片段化模式的相似性估计遗传相关性。聚类分析确定了遗传相关的分离株。紧密聚类(相似性≥85%)中的分离株之间的联系被视为传播的证据。有五个农场有足够数量的紧密聚类用于假设检验。在遗传上区分分离株的最主要因素是来源农场和采样时间。分离株在遗传上也因地点、建筑物、房间和猪栏而有所不同。基因型与生产阶段或宿主/环境储存库之间没有一致的关联。血清型分析证实,沙门氏菌谱系因采样地点和场所而有所不同。因此,沙门氏菌传播主要发生在短距离内,即在同一猪栏或房间内,同一场所的不同房间和建筑物之间也有一些传播,但不同场所之间的传播有限。在由不同宿主物种和环境储存库代表的各种生态位中都观察到了传播。随着时间的推移,遗传差异反映了不同沙门氏菌基因型多次引入生态系统以及谱系内的进化变化。减少猪生产生态系统中沙门氏菌流行率 的干预策略最好针对维持传播的空间障碍,而针对特定生物宿主或环境储存库 的干预不太可能有效。