• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

嗓音障碍严重程度的感知评估与客观多参数评估之间的关系。

The relationship between perceptual evaluation and objective multiparametric evaluation of dysphonia severity.

作者信息

Hakkesteegt Marieke M, Brocaar Michael P, Wieringa Marjan H, Feenstra Louw

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Voice. 2008 Mar;22(2):138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.09.010. Epub 2007 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.09.010
PMID:17570633
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the usefulness of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI) as an objective multiparametric measurement in assessing dysphonia. The DSI was compared with the score on Grade of the GRBAS scale. Investigated was also whether the DSI is related to severity of dysphonia, which was represented by different diagnosis groups. Furthermore, it was investigated whether the DSI can differentiate between a group of patients and a control group. A total of 294 patients with different voice pathologies were included. A control group consisted of 118 volunteers without any voice complaints. The voices of all participants were perceptually evaluated on Grade, and the DSI was measured. The groups of patients with voice complaints have a lower DSI and higher scores on Grade than the control group. The DSI was significantly lower when the score on Grade was higher. The DSI discriminates between patients with nonorganic voice disorders, vocal fold mass lesions, and vocal fold paresis/paralysis. To determine whether the DSI discriminates between patients and controls, the sensitivity and specificity for different DSI cutoff points were calculated. With a DSI cutoff of 3.0, maximum sensitivity (0.72) and specificity (0.75) were found. We conclude that the DSI is a useful instrument to objectively measure the severity of dysphonia.

摘要

本研究的目的是调查嗓音障碍严重程度指数(DSI)作为评估嗓音障碍的客观多参数测量方法的实用性。将DSI与GRBAS量表的等级评分进行比较。还研究了DSI是否与由不同诊断组代表的嗓音障碍严重程度相关。此外,研究了DSI是否能够区分患者组和对照组。总共纳入了294例患有不同嗓音疾病的患者。一个对照组由118名无任何嗓音问题的志愿者组成。所有参与者的嗓音都在等级方面进行了感知评估,并测量了DSI。有嗓音问题的患者组的DSI低于对照组,且等级评分高于对照组。等级评分越高,DSI越低。DSI能够区分非器质性嗓音障碍、声带肿物病变和声带麻痹/瘫痪患者。为了确定DSI是否能区分患者和对照组,计算了不同DSI临界值的敏感性和特异性。当DSI临界值为3.0时,发现最大敏感性(0.72)和特异性(0.75)。我们得出结论,DSI是客观测量嗓音障碍严重程度的有用工具。

相似文献

1
The relationship between perceptual evaluation and objective multiparametric evaluation of dysphonia severity.嗓音障碍严重程度的感知评估与客观多参数评估之间的关系。
J Voice. 2008 Mar;22(2):138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.09.010. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
2
Correlation among the dysphonia severity index (DSI), the RBH voice perceptual evaluation, and minimum glottal area in female patients with vocal fold nodules.声带小结女性患者的嗓音障碍严重程度指数(DSI)、RBH嗓音感知评估与最小声门面积之间的相关性。
J Voice. 2014 Jan;28(1):20-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
3
The interobserver and test-retest variability of the dysphonia severity index.嗓音障碍严重程度指数的观察者间及重测变异性。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008;60(2):86-90. doi: 10.1159/000114650. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
4
Correlation of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and Gender in Brazilians With and Without Voice Disorders.巴西有嗓音障碍和无嗓音障碍人群中,嗓音障碍严重程度指数(DSI)、嗓音的共识听觉-感知评估(CAPE-V)与性别的相关性。
J Voice. 2016 Nov;30(6):765.e7-765.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.10.013. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
5
Vocal quality characteristics in children with cleft palate: a multiparameter approach.腭裂患儿的嗓音质量特征:一种多参数方法。
J Voice. 2004 Sep;18(3):354-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2003.12.006.
6
The Relationship Between the Aerodynamic Parameters of Voice and Perceptual Evaluation in the Iranian Population With or Without Voice Disorders.伊朗有或无嗓音障碍人群中嗓音的空气动力学参数与感知评估之间的关系
J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):250.e9-250.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.07.014. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
7
Functional voice outcomes after thyroidectomy: an assessment of the Dsyphonia Severity Index (DSI) after thyroidectomy.甲状腺切除术后的功能嗓音结果:甲状腺切除术后的嗓音障碍严重程度指数(DSI)评估。
Surgery. 2010 Jun;147(6):861-70. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.11.017. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
8
Influence of age and gender on the dysphonia severity index. A study of normative values.年龄和性别对嗓音障碍严重程度指数的影响。一项关于正常值的研究。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2006;58(4):264-73. doi: 10.1159/000093183.
9
Clinical voice analysis of Carnatic singers.卡纳提克歌手的临床嗓音分析。
J Voice. 2014 Jan;28(1):128.e1-128.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
10
Factors predicting patient perception of dysphonia caused by benign vocal fold lesions.预测患者对良性声带病变所致发声困难感知的因素。
Laryngoscope. 2004 Oct;114(10):1693-700. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200410000-00004.

引用本文的文献

1
Looking for an Objective Parameter to Identify Early Vocal Dysfunctions in Healthy Perceived Singers.寻找一种客观参数以识别自觉健康的歌唱者的早期嗓音功能障碍。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Sep;75(3):1839-1846. doi: 10.1007/s12070-023-03726-0. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
2
Outcome measurement tools for communication, voice and speech intelligibility in the ICU and their clinimetric properties: A systematic review.重症监护病房中沟通、语音及言语清晰度的结局测量工具及其临床测量特性:一项系统综述。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2022 Nov;23(4):459-472. doi: 10.1177/1751143720963757. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
3
Quantitative Measurement of Dysphonia Severity in Patients With Stroke With Unilateral Vocal Cord Palsy.
单侧声带麻痹性脑卒中患者发声障碍严重程度的定量测量
Brain Neurorehabil. 2022 Nov 23;15(3):e29. doi: 10.12786/bn.2022.15.e29. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
Dysphonia Severity Index and Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice Outcomes, and Their Relation in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19.新冠病毒感染住院患者的嗓音障碍严重程度指数、嗓音结局的共识听觉感知评估及其关系
J Voice. 2025 May;39(3):853.e1-853.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.11.034. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
5
Multidimensional Voice Assessment After Management of Early Laryngeal Cancer: A Comparative Study.早期喉癌治疗后的多维嗓音评估:一项对比研究。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun;75(2):420-426. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03268-x. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
6
Examining Relationships Between GRBAS Ratings and Acoustic, Aerodynamic and Patient-Reported Voice Measures in Adults With Voice Disorders.研究嗓音障碍成人的GRBAS评分与声学、空气动力学及患者报告的嗓音指标之间的关系。
J Voice. 2023 May;37(3):390-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2021.02.007. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
7
Pathology-Related Influences on the VEM: Three Years' Experience since Implementation of a New Parameter in Phoniatric Voice Diagnostics.病理学对 VEM 的影响:新参数在语音诊断中应用三年的经验。
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Dec 21;2020:5309508. doi: 10.1155/2020/5309508. eCollection 2020.
8
A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.嗓音障碍严重程度指数与声学嗓音质量指数在区分正常嗓音和嗓音障碍嗓音方面的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;275(4):949-958. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4903-x. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
9
Diagnostic and therapeutic pitfalls in benign vocal fold diseases.良性声带疾病的诊断与治疗误区
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec 13;12:Doc01. doi: 10.3205/cto000093.
10
Evaluation of auditory and visual feedback for airflow interruption.气流中断的听觉和视觉反馈评估。
J Voice. 2013 Mar;27(2):149-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Dec 29.