• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

嗓音障碍严重程度指数的观察者间及重测变异性。

The interobserver and test-retest variability of the dysphonia severity index.

作者信息

Hakkesteegt Marieke M, Wieringa Marjan H, Brocaar Michael P, Mulder Paul G H, Feenstra Louw

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008;60(2):86-90. doi: 10.1159/000114650. Epub 2008 Jan 31.

DOI:10.1159/000114650
PMID:18235196
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the interobserver variability and the test-retest variability of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), a multiparametric instrument to assess voice quality.

METHODS

The DSI was measured in 30 nonsmoking volunteers without voice complaints or voice disorders by two speech pathologists. The subjects were measured on 3 different days, with an interval of 1 week.

RESULTS

The difference in DSI between two observers (interobserver difference) was not significant. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the DSI was 0.79. The standard deviation of the difference between two duplicate measurements by different observers was 1.27.

CONCLUSION

Differences in measurements between different observers were not significant. The intraclass correlation coefficient of the DSI was 0.79, which is to be considered good. Differences in DSI within one patient need to be larger than 2.49 to be significant.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查用于评估嗓音质量的多参数工具——嗓音障碍严重程度指数(DSI)的观察者间变异性和重测变异性。

方法

两名言语病理学家对30名无嗓音主诉或嗓音障碍的非吸烟志愿者进行DSI测量。受试者在3个不同日期进行测量,间隔为1周。

结果

两名观察者之间的DSI差异(观察者间差异)不显著。DSI的组内相关系数为0.79。不同观察者进行的两次重复测量之间差异的标准差为1.27。

结论

不同观察者之间的测量差异不显著。DSI的组内相关系数为0.79,可认为良好。同一患者DSI的差异需大于2.49才有显著性。

相似文献

1
The interobserver and test-retest variability of the dysphonia severity index.嗓音障碍严重程度指数的观察者间及重测变异性。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2008;60(2):86-90. doi: 10.1159/000114650. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
2
An examination of intrasubject variability on the Dysphonia Severity Index.对嗓音障碍严重程度指数的个体内变异性的研究。
J Voice. 2012 Nov;26(6):814.e21-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2012.04.004. Epub 2012 Aug 24.
3
The relationship between perceptual evaluation and objective multiparametric evaluation of dysphonia severity.嗓音障碍严重程度的感知评估与客观多参数评估之间的关系。
J Voice. 2008 Mar;22(2):138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2006.09.010. Epub 2007 Jun 14.
4
Effect of geographical and ethnic variation on Dysphonia Severity Index: a study of Indian population.地理和民族差异对嗓音障碍严重指数的影响:一项针对印度人群的研究。
J Voice. 2012 Jan;26(1):e11-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2010.05.008. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
5
Inter-device reliability of DSI measurement.DSI测量的设备间可靠性。
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. 2012 Dec;37(4):167-73. doi: 10.3109/14015439.2012.687761. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
6
Influence of age and gender on the dysphonia severity index. A study of normative values.年龄和性别对嗓音障碍严重程度指数的影响。一项关于正常值的研究。
Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2006;58(4):264-73. doi: 10.1159/000093183.
7
Functional voice outcomes after thyroidectomy: an assessment of the Dsyphonia Severity Index (DSI) after thyroidectomy.甲状腺切除术后的功能嗓音结果:甲状腺切除术后的嗓音障碍严重程度指数(DSI)评估。
Surgery. 2010 Jun;147(6):861-70. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.11.017. Epub 2010 Jan 21.
8
Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.不同类型嗓音样本的听感知评估中评估者可靠性的比较。
J Voice. 2012 Sep;26(5):666.e13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2011.08.003. Epub 2012 Jan 11.
9
Correlation of the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI), Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V), and Gender in Brazilians With and Without Voice Disorders.巴西有嗓音障碍和无嗓音障碍人群中,嗓音障碍严重程度指数(DSI)、嗓音的共识听觉-感知评估(CAPE-V)与性别的相关性。
J Voice. 2016 Nov;30(6):765.e7-765.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.10.013. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
10
The long-term speech outcome in Flemish young adults after two different types of palatoplasty.两种不同类型腭裂修复术后佛兰芒青年成人的长期言语结果
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2004 Jul;68(7):865-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2004.01.020.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of a mobile phone application in managing voice health for teachers: A randomized controlled trial.一款手机应用程序对教师嗓音健康管理的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
Digit Health. 2025 Jul 2;11:20552076251351805. doi: 10.1177/20552076251351805. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Harnessing Machine Learning in Vocal Arts Medicine: A Random Forest Application for "Fach" Classification in Opera.声乐艺术医学中机器学习的应用:随机森林在歌剧“声部”分类中的应用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Sep 6;13(18):2870. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13182870.
3
Multidimensional Voice Assessment After Management of Early Laryngeal Cancer: A Comparative Study.
早期喉癌治疗后的多维嗓音评估:一项对比研究。
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023 Jun;75(2):420-426. doi: 10.1007/s12070-022-03268-x. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
4
Effects of High Cervical Spinal Cord Stimulation on Gait Disturbance and Dysarthropneumophonia in Parkinson's Disease and Parkinson Variant of Multiple System Atrophy: A Case Series.高颈段脊髓刺激对帕金森病和多系统萎缩帕金森变异型步态障碍及构音性发声困难的影响:病例系列
Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 10;12(9):1222. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12091222.
5
CoQ10 and Vitamin A Supplementation Support Voice Rehabilitation. A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled, Three-Period Cross-Over Pilot Study.补充辅酶Q10和维生素A有助于嗓音康复。一项双盲、随机、对照、三阶段交叉试验性研究。
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Sep 10;10:939. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00939. eCollection 2019.
6
The Vocal Extent Measure: Development of a Novel Parameter in Voice Diagnostics and Initial Clinical Experience.嗓音幅度测量:一种新的嗓音诊断参数的发展及初步临床经验。
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Mar 4;2018:3836714. doi: 10.1155/2018/3836714. eCollection 2018.
7
A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.嗓音障碍严重程度指数与声学嗓音质量指数在区分正常嗓音和嗓音障碍嗓音方面的比较。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Apr;275(4):949-958. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4903-x. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
8
Is OperaVOX a clinically useful tool for the assessment of voice in a general ENT clinic?OperaVOX在普通耳鼻喉科诊所中是一种评估嗓音的临床实用工具吗?
BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord. 2017 Apr 21;17:4. doi: 10.1186/s12901-017-0037-9. eCollection 2017.
9
UES pressure during phonation using high-resolution manometry and 24-h dual-probe pH-metry in patients with muscle tension dysphonia.肌紧张性发声障碍患者在发声时的UES 压力采用高分辨率测压法和 24 小时双探头 pH 测压法评估。
Dysphagia. 2012 Jun;27(2):198-209. doi: 10.1007/s00455-011-9354-0. Epub 2011 Jul 7.
10
Clinical value of acoustic voice measures: a retrospective study.嗓音声学测量的临床价值:一项回顾性研究。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Aug;267(8):1261-71. doi: 10.1007/s00405-010-1214-2. Epub 2010 Feb 21.