Smith D P, Cason J A, Fletcher D L, Hannah J F
USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Richard B. Russell Research Center, Athens, GA 30605, USA.
Poult Sci. 2007 Jul;86(7):1436-9. doi: 10.1093/ps/86.7.1436.
Experiments were conducted to evaluate a scraping method for enumerating bacteria on broiler carcasses. In experiment 1, coliforms and Escherichia coli were determined by the whole-carcass rinse (WCR) method and by scraping the skin surface and rinsing the blade (BR). In each of 2 replicate trials, 4 prechill broiler carcasses were collected from 2 different commercial processing plants. The WCR method was conducted on each carcass, then a blunt edge blade was used to scrape an area measuring approximately 80 cm(2) of the breast (front) skin and on the back of the carcass. After scraping, each blade and adhering residue was rinsed in 30 mL of 0.1% peptone. One milliliter of rinsate each from the WCR and BR was plated to determine total coliforms and E. coli. In experiment 2, 6 carcasses were collected from a processing plant in each of 2 replicate trials. Carcasses were split, with one half scraped on all skin surfaces, and the other half remaining unscraped as a control; all halves were then subjected to half-carcass rinses using 200 mL of 0.1% peptone. Coliforms and E. coli were enumerated. Results from both experiments are reported as log cfu/mL. In experiment 1, mean coliform WCR counts (5.1) were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than back BR (2.8), which were higher than front BR (2.2). Mean E. coli WCR counts (4.5) were higher than back BR (2.4), which were higher than front BR (1.6). The counts for BR adjusted for the greater surface area sampled by WCR were still lower than the WCR counts. Experiment 2 results showed no difference between control and scraped carcass halves for coliforms (4.7) or E. coli (4.6). Overall, results showed that scraping either prior to or after rinsing did not increase enumeration of coliforms or E. coli. Scraping could be a viable method to compare the numbers of bacteria on different areas of the same carcass.
开展了实验以评估一种用于计数肉鸡胴体上细菌的刮擦方法。在实验1中,通过全胴体冲洗(WCR)法以及刮擦皮肤表面并冲洗刀片(BR)的方法来测定大肠菌群和大肠杆菌。在2次重复试验的每次试验中,从2个不同的商业加工厂收集4只宰前肉鸡胴体。对每个胴体进行WCR法,然后用钝边刀片刮擦胴体胸部(前部)皮肤和胴体背部大约80平方厘米的区域。刮擦后,将每个刀片及附着的残渣在30毫升0.1%蛋白胨中冲洗。从WCR和BR冲洗液中各取1毫升进行平板接种,以测定总大肠菌群和大肠杆菌。在实验2中,在2次重复试验的每次试验中从一个加工厂收集6只胴体。将胴体劈开,一半在所有皮肤表面进行刮擦,另一半不刮擦作为对照;然后对所有半胴体用200毫升0.1%蛋白胨进行半胴体冲洗。对大肠菌群和大肠杆菌进行计数。两个实验的结果均以log cfu/mL报告。在实验1中,大肠菌群的WCR平均计数(5.1)显著高于背部BR(2.8),而背部BR高于前部BR(2.2)。大肠杆菌的WCR平均计数(4.5)高于背部BR(2.4),而背部BR高于前部BR(1.6)。经WCR采样的更大表面积调整后的BR计数仍低于WCR计数。实验2的结果表明,对照半胴体和刮擦半胴体在大肠菌群(4.7)或大肠杆菌(4.6)方面没有差异。总体而言,结果表明在冲洗之前或之后刮擦均不会增加大肠菌群或大肠杆菌的计数。刮擦可能是一种用于比较同一胴体不同部位细菌数量的可行方法。