• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

L5-S1 腹腔镜前路椎间融合术

L5-S1 laparoscopic anterior interbody fusion.

作者信息

Frantzides Constantine T, Zeni Tallal M, Phillips Frank M, Mathur Sameer, Zografakis John G, Moore Ronald M, Laguna Luis E

机构信息

Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, Department of Surgery, Evanston Northwestern Healthcare and Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60201, USA.

出版信息

JSLS. 2006 Oct-Dec;10(4):488-92.

PMID:17575763
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3015738/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated our experience with laparoscopic L5-S1 anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).

METHODS

This represents a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent L5-S1 laparoscopic ALIF between February 1998 and August 2003.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients underwent L5-S1 LAIF (15 males and 13 females). The mean age was 43 years (range, 26 to 67). Mean operative time was 225 minutes (range, 137 to 309 minutes). No conversions to an open procedure were necessary. Twenty-four (85.7%) patients underwent successful bilateral cage placement. Four patients (14.3%) in whom only a single cage could be placed underwent supplementary posterior pedicle screw placement. Mean length of stay (LOS) was 4.1 days (range, 2-to 15). Two patients underwent reoperation subacutely secondary to symptomatic lateral displacement of the cage. One patient developed radiculopathy 6 months postoperatively and required reoperation. One patient developed a small bowel obstruction secondary to adhesions to the cage requiring laparoscopic reoperation. Fusion was achieved in all patients. Visual analogue scale scores for back pain were significantly improved from 8.6+/-0.8 to 2.8+/-0.8 (P<0.0001) at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

L5-S1 LAIF is feasible and safe with all the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Fusion rates and pain improvement were comparable to those with an open repair.

摘要

目的

我们评估了腹腔镜下L5 - S1前路腰椎椎间融合术(ALIF)的经验。

方法

这是一项对1998年2月至2003年8月期间连续接受L5 - S1腹腔镜ALIF手术患者的回顾性分析。

结果

28例患者接受了L5 - S1 LAIF手术(15例男性,13例女性)。平均年龄为43岁(范围26至67岁)。平均手术时间为225分钟(范围137至309分钟)。无需转为开放手术。24例(85.7%)患者成功进行了双侧椎间融合器置入。4例(14.3%)仅能置入单个椎间融合器的患者接受了补充后路椎弓根螺钉置入。平均住院时间(LOS)为4.1天(范围2至15天)。2例患者因椎间融合器出现有症状的侧向移位而在亚急性期接受了再次手术。1例患者术后6个月出现神经根病,需要再次手术。1例患者因与椎间融合器粘连继发小肠梗阻,需要腹腔镜再次手术。所有患者均实现了融合。背痛的视觉模拟评分在1年时从8.6±0.8显著改善至2.8±0.8(P<0.0001)。

结论

L5 - S1 LAIF可行且安全,具有微创手术的所有优点。融合率和疼痛改善情况与开放修复相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d32/3015738/c391ae377b46/jsls-10-4-488-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d32/3015738/6aa98303b6f9/jsls-10-4-488-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d32/3015738/939e6757a061/jsls-10-4-488-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d32/3015738/c391ae377b46/jsls-10-4-488-g03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d32/3015738/6aa98303b6f9/jsls-10-4-488-g01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d32/3015738/939e6757a061/jsls-10-4-488-g02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d32/3015738/c391ae377b46/jsls-10-4-488-g03.jpg

相似文献

1
L5-S1 laparoscopic anterior interbody fusion.L5-S1 腹腔镜前路椎间融合术
JSLS. 2006 Oct-Dec;10(4):488-92.
2
Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.胸腰段冠状面弯曲顶点多级外侧椎间融合术在成人脊柱畸形手术中联合开放后路内固定及L5-S1椎间融合的效用:32例病例匹配评估
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Feb;26(2):208-219. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.SPINE151543. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
3
Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) of the L5-S1 segment: initial clinical and radiographic experience.L5-S1节段经皮轴向腰椎椎间融合术(AxiaLIF):初步临床及影像学经验
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2008 Aug;51(4):225-30. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1080915.
4
Comparative study of laparoscopic L5-S1 fusion versus open mini-ALIF, with a minimum 2-year follow-up.腹腔镜L5-S1融合术与开放式mini-ALIF的对比研究,至少随访2年。
Eur Spine J. 2003 Dec;12(6):613-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0526-y. Epub 2003 Oct 17.
5
Rate of failure of indirect decompression in lateral single-position surgery: clinical results.侧卧位单入路间接减压手术失败率:临床结果。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Sep;49(3):E5. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20375.
6
Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a prospective study of complications.使用重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2的腰椎前路椎间融合术:并发症的前瞻性研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2014 Dec;21(6):851-60. doi: 10.3171/2014.8.SPINE13524. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
7
Reamed transacral interbody fusion for L5-s1 pseudoarthrosis: a novel salvage technique in 10 patients.扩孔减压经骶骨椎间融合术治疗L5-S1假关节:10例患者的一种新型挽救技术
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013 Aug;26(6):334-41. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318246b767.
8
Mini-open oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) approach for multi-level discectomy and fusion involving L5-S1: Preliminary experience.迷你开放斜行腰椎椎间融合术(OLIF)治疗累及L5-S1的多节段椎间盘切除术和融合术:初步经验
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):295-299. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.11.016. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
9
Comparison of the mini-open versus laparoscopic approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective review.微创开放与腹腔镜前路腰椎椎间融合术的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Neurosurgery. 2002 Jul;51(1):97-103; discussion 103-5. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200207000-00015.
10
Laparoscopic approach to L4-L5 for interbody fusion using BAK cages: experience in the first 58 cases.使用BAK椎间融合器经腹腔镜行L4-L5椎间融合术:前58例经验
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Oct 15;24(20):2171-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199910150-00018.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and future directions.微创腹腔镜和机器人辅助前路腰椎椎间融合术:系统评价与未来方向
BMC Surg. 2025 May 21;25(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02890-0.
2
Endoscopic Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.内镜下腰椎前路椎间融合术:系统评价与Meta分析。
Asian Spine J. 2023 Dec;17(6):1139-1154. doi: 10.31616/asj.2023.0135. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
3
Clinical utility of ozone therapy and hyperbaric oxygen therapy in degenerative disc disease.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative study of laparoscopic L5-S1 fusion versus open mini-ALIF, with a minimum 2-year follow-up.腹腔镜L5-S1融合术与开放式mini-ALIF的对比研究,至少随访2年。
Eur Spine J. 2003 Dec;12(6):613-7. doi: 10.1007/s00586-003-0526-y. Epub 2003 Oct 17.
2
Minimally invasive lumbar fusion.微创腰椎融合术
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 1;28(15 Suppl):S26-35. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000076895.52418.5E.
3
Interbody cage devices.椎间融合器装置
臭氧治疗和高压氧治疗在退行性椎间盘疾病中的临床应用。
Med Gas Res. 2023 Jan-Mar;13(1):1-6. doi: 10.4103/2045-9912.351890.
4
Is there a variance in complication types associated with ALIF approaches? A systematic review.前路椎间融合术(ALIF)入路相关并发症类型是否存在差异?系统评价。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Nov;163(11):2991-3004. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-05000-0. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
5
Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Left-sided Inferior Vena Cava and Right-sided Aortic Arch.左侧下腔静脉和右侧主动脉弓情况下的前路腰椎椎间融合术。
Orthop Surg. 2017 Feb;9(1):133-135. doi: 10.1111/os.12306. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
6
Perforation of the sigmoid colon due to intradiscal spacer dislocation.因椎间盘内间隔物移位导致乙状结肠穿孔。
Eur Spine J. 2011 Jul;20 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S289-93. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-1696-7. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 1;28(15 Suppl):S2-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000076841.93570.78.
4
Comparison of the mini-open versus laparoscopic approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective review.微创开放与腹腔镜前路腰椎椎间融合术的比较:一项回顾性研究。
Neurosurgery. 2002 Jul;51(1):97-103; discussion 103-5. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200207000-00015.
5
Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results.腰椎经皮椎弓根螺钉固定术:初步临床结果
J Neurosurg. 2002 Jul;97(1 Suppl):7-12. doi: 10.3171/spi.2002.97.1.0007.
6
Laparoscopic anterior lumbar interbody fusion with rhBMP-2: a prospective study of clinical and radiographic outcomes.腹腔镜下前路腰椎椎间融合术联合重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2:临床及影像学结果的前瞻性研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Dec 15;26(24):2751-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200112150-00026.
7
Laparoscopic spinal fusion of L4-L5 and L5-S1.L4-L5和L5-S1的腹腔镜脊柱融合术。
Surg Endosc. 2001 Nov;15(11):1308-12. doi: 10.1007/s004640000184. Epub 2001 Sep 4.
8
A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-L5 fusion: laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion.L4-L5前路融合术手术方式的前瞻性比较:腹腔镜手术与微创前路腰椎椎间融合术
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Oct 15;25(20):2682-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200010150-00023.
9
Four-year follow-up results of lumbar spine arthrodesis using the Bagby and Kuslich lumbar fusion cage.使用Bagby和Kuslich腰椎融合器进行腰椎融合术的四年随访结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Oct 15;25(20):2656-62. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200010150-00018.
10
Efficacy of the laparoscopic approach for anterior lumbar spinal fusion.
Surgery. 2000 Oct;128(4):589-96. doi: 10.1067/msy.2000.108055.