Manheimer Eric, Linde Klaus, Lao Lixing, Bouter Lex M, Berman Brian M
Center for Integrative Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Kernan Hospital Mansion, Baltimore, Maryland 21207, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jun 19;146(12):868-77. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-146-12-200706190-00008.
Knee osteoarthritis is a major cause of pain and functional limitation.
To evaluate the effects of acupuncture for treating knee osteoarthritis.
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, and EMBASE databases to January 2007. No language restrictions were applied.
Randomized trials longer than 6 weeks in duration that compared needle acupuncture with a sham, usual care, or waiting list control group for patients with knee osteoarthritis.
Two authors independently agreed on eligibility, assessed methodological quality and acupuncture adequacy, and extracted outcome data on pain and function measures.
Eleven trials met the selection criteria, and 9 reported sufficient data for pooling. Standardized mean differences were calculated by using differences in improvements from baseline between patients assigned to acupuncture and those assigned to control groups. Compared with patients in waiting list control groups, patients who received acupuncture reported clinically relevant short-term improvements in pain (standardized mean difference, -0.96 [95% CI, -1.21 to -0.70]) and function (standardized mean difference, -0.93 [CI, -1.16 to -0.69]). Patients who received acupuncture also reported clinically relevant short- and long-term improvements in pain and function compared with patients in usual care control groups. Compared with a sham control, acupuncture provided clinically irrelevant short-term improvements in pain (standardized mean difference, -0.35 [CI, -0.55 to -0.15]) and function (standardized mean difference, -0.35 [CI, -0.56 to -0.14]) and clinically irrelevant long-term improvements in pain (standardized mean difference, -0.13 [CI, -0.24 to -0.01]) and function (standardized mean difference, -0.14 [CI, -0.26 to -0.03]).
Sham-controlled trials had heterogeneous results that were probably due to the variability of acupuncture and sham protocols, patient samples, and settings.
Sham-controlled trials show clinically irrelevant short-term benefits of acupuncture for treating knee osteoarthritis. Waiting list-controlled trials suggest clinically relevant benefits, some of which may be due to placebo or expectation effects.
膝关节骨关节炎是疼痛和功能受限的主要原因。
评估针刺治疗膝关节骨关节炎的效果。
截至2007年1月的考克兰对照试验中央注册库、MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库。未设语言限制。
对膝关节骨关节炎患者进行的、为期超过6周的随机试验,比较针刺与假针刺、常规护理或等待名单对照组。
两位作者独立确定入选标准,评估方法学质量和针刺的充分性,并提取疼痛和功能测量的结果数据。
11项试验符合选择标准,9项报告了足够的数据进行汇总。通过计算针刺组患者与对照组患者自基线起改善情况的差异,得出标准化均数差。与等待名单对照组患者相比,接受针刺治疗的患者在疼痛(标准化均数差,-0.96 [95%可信区间,-1.21至-0.70])和功能(标准化均数差,-0.93 [可信区间,-1.16至-0.69])方面有临床相关的短期改善。与常规护理对照组患者相比,接受针刺治疗的患者在疼痛和功能方面也有临床相关的短期和长期改善。与假针刺对照组相比,针刺在疼痛(标准化均数差,-0.35 [可信区间,-0.55至-0.15])和功能(标准化均数差,-0.35 [可信区间,-0.56至-0.14])方面有临床不相关的短期改善,在疼痛(标准化均数差,-0.13 [可信区间,-0.24至-0.01])和功能(标准化均数差,-0.14 [可信区间,-0.26至-0.03])方面有临床不相关的长期改善。
假针刺对照试验结果存在异质性,可能是由于针刺和假针刺方案、患者样本及环境的差异所致。
假针刺对照试验显示针刺治疗膝关节骨关节炎的短期益处与临床无关。等待名单对照试验表明有临床相关益处,其中一些可能归因于安慰剂或期望效应。