用于治疗膝关节骨关节炎的支具和矫形器。
Braces and orthoses for treating osteoarthritis of the knee.
作者信息
Brouwer R W, Jakma T S C, Verhagen A P, Verhaar J A N, Bierma-Zeinstra S M A
机构信息
Orthopaedic surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015 GD.
出版信息
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25(1):CD004020. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004020.pub2.
BACKGROUND
Patients with osteoarthritis of the knee can be treated with a brace or orthosis (shoe insole). The main purpose of these aids is to reduce pain, improve physical function and, possibly, to slow disease progression.
OBJECTIVES
To assess the effectiveness of a brace or orthosis in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE and EMBASE (Current contents, Health STAR) up to October 2002. The reference lists of the publications in the identified trials were also screened.
SELECTION CRITERIA
Extracted studies were included in the final analysis if they met the pre-defined inclusion criteria: 1) a randomised controlled clinical trial or a controlled clinical trial, 2) all patients had osteoarthritis of the knee, 3) the intervention in one of the studied groups was a brace or an orthosis.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers independently selected the trials and assessed the methodological quality using the Delphi-list and one additional question about care programs. Three reviewers independently extracted the data on the intervention, type of outcome measures, follow-up, loss to follow-up, and results, using a pre-tested standardized form. Study authors were contacted for additional information.
MAIN RESULTS
Four trials involving a total of 444 people were included in this review. One study investigated a knee brace and three studies examined different types of orthoses for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Two studies were of high methodological quality while the other two studies were low. Notably, the randomisation and the blinding procedures were either insufficient or not described. The follow-up period (six weeks to six months) was too short to demonstrate long-term results. Pooling was difficult primarily due to the heterogeneity of the data and the way the information was presented. The pain, stiffness and physical function (WOMAC and MACTAR) scores of a brace group showed greater improvement at six months compared with a neoprene sleeve group, which showed greater improvement compared with a control group. The numbers of days of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) intake decreased significantly (relative percentage difference 23.9%) compared with baseline in a group with laterally wedged insoles,and remained unchanged in the neutrally wedged group. Patient compliance with the laterally wedged insole was significantly better compared with the neutrally wedged insole. In one study, the Visual Analogue Pain (VAS) pain score was significantly decreased from baseline in a strapped insole group (RPD - 24%), but not in the traditional lateral wedge group, but this strapped insole showed more adverse effects (popliteal pain, low back pain, and foot sole pain) compared with the traditional lateral wedge insole. Pain during bed rest, after getting up, after getting up from seated position and walking distance was significantly improved in a subtalar strapped group compared with baseline, and no improvement was found in a sock type group. No studies were found that assessed the effectiveness of a brace or orthosis to treat lateral compartment osteoarthritis or general osteoarthritis of the knee, or that compared a knee brace with a wedge insole, or that compared a brace or orthosis with operative treatment.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on one brace study we conclude there is limited evidence that: a brace has additional beneficial effect (WOMAC, MACTAR, function tests) for knee osteoarthritis compared with medical treatment alone.(Silver) a sleeve has additional beneficial effect (WOMAC, function tests) for knee osteoarthritis compared with medical treatment alone.(Silver) a brace is more effective (WOMAC, function tests) than a neoprene sleeve.(Silver) Based on 3 orthoses studies, of which 2 were high quality, (n=2) we conclude there is limited evidence that: a laterally wedged insole decreases NSAID intake compared with a neutral insole. (Silver) patient compliance is better in the laterally wedged insole compared with a neutral insole. (Silver) a strapped insole has more adverse effects than a lateral wedge insole. (Silver).
背景
膝骨关节炎患者可用支具或矫形器(鞋垫)进行治疗。这些辅助器具的主要目的是减轻疼痛、改善身体功能,并可能减缓疾病进展。
目的
评估支具或矫形器治疗膝骨关节炎的有效性。
检索策略
我们检索了截至2002年10月的Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE和EMBASE(现刊目次、Health STAR)。还筛选了纳入试验中出版物的参考文献列表。
选择标准
如果提取的研究符合预先定义的纳入标准,则纳入最终分析:1)随机对照临床试验或对照临床试验;2)所有患者均患有膝骨关节炎;3)研究组之一的干预措施为支具或矫形器。
数据收集与分析
两名综述作者独立选择试验,并使用德尔菲列表及一个关于护理方案的附加问题评估方法学质量。三名综述作者使用预先测试的标准化表格独立提取关于干预措施、结局测量类型、随访、失访及结果的数据。与研究作者联系以获取更多信息。
主要结果
本综述纳入了4项试验,共444人。一项研究调查了膝关节支具,三项研究检查了用于膝关节内侧间室骨关节炎的不同类型的矫形器。两项研究方法学质量高,另外两项研究质量低。值得注意的是,随机化和盲法程序要么不充分,要么未描述。随访期(6周至6个月)太短,无法显示长期结果。合并分析困难,主要是由于数据的异质性以及信息呈现方式。与氯丁橡胶袖套组相比,支具组在6个月时的疼痛、僵硬和身体功能(WOMAC和MACTAR)评分改善更大,氯丁橡胶袖套组比对照组改善更大。与基线相比,外侧楔形鞋垫组非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)摄入天数显著减少(相对百分比差异23.9%),中性楔形组则保持不变。与中性楔形鞋垫相比,患者对外侧楔形鞋垫的依从性显著更好。在一项研究中,绑带鞋垫组的视觉模拟疼痛(VAS)评分较基线显著降低(相对百分比差异-24%),而传统外侧楔形组则未降低,但与传统外侧楔形鞋垫相比,这种绑带鞋垫显示出更多不良反应(腘窝疼痛、腰痛和足底疼痛)。与基线相比,距下绑带组卧床休息、起床后、从坐位起身和步行距离时的疼痛显著改善,而袜子型组未改善。未发现评估支具或矫形器治疗膝关节外侧间室骨关节炎或膝关节一般性骨关节炎有效性的研究,也未发现比较膝关节支具与楔形鞋垫,或比较支具或矫形器与手术治疗的研究。
作者结论
基于一项支具研究,我们得出结论,证据有限,表明:与单纯药物治疗相比,支具对膝骨关节炎有额外有益作用(WOMAC、MACTAR、功能测试)。(银级)与单纯药物治疗相比,袖套对膝骨关节炎有额外有益作用(WOMAC、功能测试)。(银级)与氯丁橡胶袖套相比,支具更有效(WOMAC、功能测试)。(银级)基于3项矫形器研究,其中2项质量高,(n = 2)我们得出结论,证据有限,表明:与中性鞋垫相比,外侧楔形鞋垫可减少NSAID摄入。(银级)与中性鞋垫相比,患者对外侧楔形鞋垫的依从性更好。(银级)与外侧楔形鞋垫相比,绑带鞋垫有更多不良反应。(银级)