Suppr超能文献

有机热化学中的计算方法。1. 烃的生成焓和自由能。

Computational methods in organic thermochemistry. 1. Hydrocarbon enthalpies and free energies of formation.

作者信息

Bond Douglas

机构信息

Computer Chemie Centrum, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nägelsbach Strasse 25, 91052 Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

J Org Chem. 2007 Jul 20;72(15):5555-66. doi: 10.1021/jo070383k. Epub 2007 Jun 20.

Abstract

Standard state enthalpies and free energies of formation can be computed with reasonable accuracy (usually within 4 and often 2 kJ/mol) using high level model chemistries. A comparison set of nearly 300 organic compounds ranging from 1 to 10 carbon atoms having a variety of functional groups for which enthalpy and free energy literature values are available has been examined using G2, G2MP2, G3, G3MP2, G3B3, G3MP2B3, CBS-QB3, and density functional (B3LYP/6-311+G(3df,2p)) model chemistries. G3 gives an average mean absolute deviation of 3.0 and 13.4 kJ/mol for the enthalpies and free energies, respectively, using the atomization method and 3.1 and 3.7 kJ/mol when bond separation reactions are employed. G3 and G3B3 are the most accurate overall; the related G3MP2 and G3MP2B3 are nearly as accurate and can compute larger molecules. CBS-QB3 was also found to be accurate but is more limited in the size of molecules that can be computed. The density functional energies were found to have large deviations from the literature values using either the atomization or the bond separation method. Regardless of the model employed, the free energies are increasingly underestimated by computation as the size of the molecule increases. A series of corrections applied to the aliphatic hydrocarbons is presented, which usually reduces the deviations to less than 4 kJ/mol regardless of the size of the molecule.

摘要

使用高水平的模型化学方法,可以以合理的精度(通常在4 kJ/mol以内,且常常在2 kJ/mol以内)计算标准状态下的生成焓和自由能。使用G2、G2MP2、G3、G3MP2、G3B3、G3MP2B3、CBS-QB3和密度泛函(B3LYP/6-311+G(3df,2p))模型化学方法,对一组近300种有机化合物进行了比较研究,这些化合物含有1至10个碳原子,具有多种官能团,且有焓和自由能的文献值可供参考。对于焓和自由能,使用原子化方法时,G3给出的平均平均绝对偏差分别为3.0和13.4 kJ/mol;使用键分离反应时,分别为3.1和3.7 kJ/mol。总体而言,G3和G3B3最为精确;相关的G3MP2和G3MP2B3几乎同样精确,并且可以计算更大的分子。还发现CBS-QB3也很精确,但在可计算分子的大小方面受到更多限制。使用原子化或键分离方法时,发现密度泛函能量与文献值有较大偏差。无论采用何种模型,随着分子尺寸的增加,计算得到的自由能越来越被低估。本文给出了一系列应用于脂肪烃的校正方法,无论分子大小如何,这些校正通常可将偏差降低至小于4 kJ/mol。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验