Chubykin Alexander A, Atasoy Deniz, Etherton Mark R, Brose Nils, Kavalali Ege T, Gibson Jay R, Südhof Thomas C
Department of Neuroscience, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9111, USA.
Neuron. 2007 Jun 21;54(6):919-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.05.029.
Neuroligins enhance synapse formation in vitro, but surprisingly are not required for the generation of synapses in vivo. We now show that in cultured neurons, neuroligin-1 overexpression increases excitatory, but not inhibitory, synaptic responses, and potentiates synaptic NMDAR/AMPAR ratios. In contrast, neuroligin-2 overexpression increases inhibitory, but not excitatory, synaptic responses. Accordingly, deletion of neuroligin-1 in knockout mice selectively decreases the NMDAR/AMPAR ratio, whereas deletion of neuroligin-2 selectively decreases inhibitory synaptic responses. Strikingly, chronic inhibition of NMDARs or CaM-Kinase II, which signals downstream of NMDARs, suppresses the synapse-boosting activity of neuroligin-1, whereas chronic inhibition of general synaptic activity suppresses the synapse-boosting activity of neuroligin-2. Taken together, these data indicate that neuroligins do not establish, but specify and validate, synapses via an activity-dependent mechanism, with different neuroligins acting on distinct types of synapses. This hypothesis reconciles the overexpression and knockout phenotypes and suggests that neuroligins contribute to the use-dependent formation of neural circuits.
神经连接蛋白在体外可增强突触形成,但令人惊讶的是,在体内突触生成过程中并非必需。我们现在表明,在培养的神经元中,神经连接蛋白-1的过表达增加了兴奋性而非抑制性突触反应,并增强了突触NMDAR/AMPAR比率。相反,神经连接蛋白-2的过表达增加了抑制性而非兴奋性突触反应。因此,基因敲除小鼠中神经连接蛋白-1的缺失选择性地降低了NMDAR/AMPAR比率,而神经连接蛋白-2的缺失则选择性地降低了抑制性突触反应。引人注目的是,NMDAR或CaM激酶II(在NMDAR下游发出信号)的慢性抑制会抑制神经连接蛋白-1的突触增强活性,而一般突触活性的慢性抑制则会抑制神经连接蛋白-2的突触增强活性。综上所述,这些数据表明,神经连接蛋白并非建立突触,而是通过一种活动依赖机制来指定和验证突触,不同的神经连接蛋白作用于不同类型的突触。这一假设调和了过表达和基因敲除表型,并表明神经连接蛋白有助于神经回路的使用依赖型形成。