Suppr超能文献

Cochrane高灵敏度检索策略第一、二、三阶段中检索词的灵敏度和精准度,该策略用于在医疗保健特定领域——艾滋病毒/艾滋病预防与治疗干预措施中识别Medline上的随机试验报告。

The sensitivity and precision of search terms in Phases I, II and III of the Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy for identifying reports of randomized trials in medline in a specific area of health care--HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment interventions.

作者信息

Eisinga Anne, Siegfried Nandi, Clarke Mike

机构信息

UK Cochrane Centre, Summertown Pavilion, Middle Way, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Health Info Libr J. 2007 Jun;24(2):103-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00698.x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To detect term(s) in the Cochrane Highly Sensitive Search Strategy (HSSS) that retain high sensitivity but improve precision in retrieving reports of trials in the PubMed version of medline.

METHODS

Individual terms from the PubMed version of the HSSS were added, term by term, to an African HIV/AIDS strategy to identify reports of trials in medline using PubMed. The titles and abstracts of the records retrieved were read by two handsearchers and checked by a clinical epidemiologist. The sensitivity and precision of each term in the three phases of the HSSS were calculated.

RESULTS

Of 7,719 records retrieved, 285 were identified as reports of trials [204 randomized (RCTs); 81 possibly randomized or quasi-randomized (CCTs)]. Phase III had the highest sensitivity (92%). Overall, precision was very low (3.7%). One term, 'random*[tw]', retrieved all RCTs found by our search and improved precision to 29%. The least sensitive terms, yielding no records, were '(doubl* AND mask*)[tw]' and terms containing 'trebl*' or 'tripl*', except for '(tripl* AND blind*)[tw]'. The highest precision per term was for 'Double-blind Method [MeSH]' (76%).

CONCLUSIONS

To retrieve all RCTs and CCTs found by our search, seven terms are needed but precision remains low (4.3%). Developments in the methods of search strategy design may help to improve precision while retaining high levels of sensitivity by identifying term(s) which occur frequently in relevant records and are the most efficient at discriminating between different study designs.

摘要

目的

在考克兰高灵敏度检索策略(HSSS)中找出能保持高灵敏度但可提高检索PubMed版医学期刊数据库中试验报告的精确性的检索词。

方法

将HSSS的PubMed版中的各个检索词逐一添加到一个非洲艾滋病毒/艾滋病检索策略中,以识别使用PubMed检索医学期刊数据库中的试验报告。两名手工检索人员阅读检索出记录的标题和摘要,并由一名临床流行病学家进行核对。计算HSSS三个阶段中每个检索词的灵敏度和精确性。

结果

在检索出的7719条记录中,285条被确定为试验报告[204条随机对照试验(RCT);81条可能为随机或半随机对照试验(CCT)]。第三阶段灵敏度最高(92%)。总体而言,精确性非常低(3.7%)。一个检索词“random*[tw]”检索出了我们检索到的所有RCT,并将精确性提高到了29%。最不灵敏的检索词,未检索到任何记录,是“(doubl* AND mask*)[tw]”以及包含“trebl*”或“tripl*”的检索词,但“(tripl* AND blind*)[tw]”除外。每个检索词的最高精确性是“双盲法 [医学主题词]”(76%)。

结论

为了检索出我们检索到的所有RCT和CCT,需要7个检索词,但精确性仍然很低(4.3%)。检索策略设计方法的发展可能有助于在保持高灵敏度的同时提高精确性,通过识别在相关记录中频繁出现且在区分不同研究设计方面最有效的检索词。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验