Kaleta Marek, Gaździk Tadeusz Szymon, Wroński Sławomir, Gajda Tomasz, Bozek Marek
Katedra i Oddział Kliniczny Ortopedii, Slaska Akademia Medyczna w Katowicach.
Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2006;71(6):431-8.
Aseptic loosening of hip prosthesis is one of the most serious complications after primary joint arthroplasty. Due to the aging of societies, lengthening of the average life span and increasing number of primary arthroplasty procedures, it can be assumed that the number of revision procedures will be continuously increasing by the year.
presentation of own experience in operative management tactics and early results of treatment after the revision hip arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND THE METHOD: The analysis included 182 patients at the average age of 68, who underwent the revision hip arthroplasty procedure. The procedures of this type were performed most often after cement arthroplasty performed using the Weller's method (45%). The average observation period was 2.3 years. A clinical evaluation of the patients was performed using the Harris scale. A preoperative radiological evaluation was performed using Paprosky classification (for an acetabulum) and Mallory classification (for a femoral bone shaft). Bone defects were evaluated using AAOS classification. A postoperative radiological evaluation was performed on the basis of: radiolucent lines of the acetabulum area in DeLee-Charnley zones and in the area of the endoprosthesis stem in Gruen zones, acetabulum migration and settling of the endoprosthesis stem.
During the 2-year observation there were 88.5% of good results reported. According to the Harris scale an improvement was achieved from the average of 46 points before the operation to 85 points after the procedure. 11.5% of bad radiological and functional results were reported including: 11 cases (6.0%) with bad radiological results, and 10 cases (5.5%) with bad clinical results.
Revision hip arthroplasty procedures require individual planning, selection of implants and additional implants. Intraoperative evaluation is required due to lack of an objective image analysis of prosthesis element loosening and a level of bone stock damage determining the scope of the procedure, selection of implants and number of allogenic grafts. Our management tactics is an effective method of aseptic loosening of acetabulum and stem treatment after primary hip arthroplasty.
髋关节假体无菌性松动是初次关节置换术后最严重的并发症之一。由于社会老龄化、平均寿命延长以及初次关节置换手术数量的增加,可以预计翻修手术的数量将逐年持续增加。
介绍髋关节翻修术后手术管理策略及早期治疗结果的自身经验。
分析包括182例平均年龄68岁的患者,他们接受了髋关节翻修手术。此类手术最常发生在采用韦勒方法进行的骨水泥关节置换术后(45%)。平均观察期为2.3年。使用Harris评分对患者进行临床评估。术前使用Paprosky分类法(用于髋臼)和Mallory分类法(用于股骨干)进行放射学评估。使用美国骨科学会(AAOS)分类法评估骨缺损。术后放射学评估基于以下内容:DeLee-Charnley区域髋臼区域的透亮线以及Gruen区域假体柄区域的透亮线、髋臼移位和假体柄沉降。
在2年的观察期内,报告的良好结果占88.5%。根据Harris评分,术前平均46分提高到术后85分。报告了11.5%的不良放射学和功能结果,包括:11例(6.0%)放射学结果不良,10例(5.5%)临床结果不良。
髋关节翻修手术需要个体化规划、植入物选择和额外植入物。由于缺乏对假体部件松动的客观图像分析以及骨量损伤程度来确定手术范围、植入物选择和异体骨移植数量,因此需要进行术中评估。我们的管理策略是初次髋关节置换术后髋臼和假体柄无菌性松动治疗的有效方法。