Bank Alan J, Kelly Aaron S, Thelen Andrea M, Kaiser Daniel R, Gonzalez-Campoy J Michael
Department of Research, St. Paul Heart Clinic, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA.
Am J Hypertens. 2007 Jul;20(7):777-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2007.01.019.
Data suggest that carvedilol possesses antioxidant properties that might provide vascular protection. We sought to compare the effects of carvedilol and metoprolol tartrate on endothelial function and oxidative stress in a head-to-head trial.
Thirty-four patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and hypertension were randomized to receive either carvedilol (n = 16) or metoprolol (n = 18) in addition to their current antihypertensive medications for 5 months. The following variables were measured pre- and posttreatment: blood pressure, fasting glucose and insulin, insulin resistance by homeostasis-model assessment, hemoglobin A1c, lipids, C-reactive protein (CRP), 8-isoprostane, asymmetric dimethylarginine, oxidized LDL cholesterol, ultrasound assessment of brachial-artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), nitroglycerin-induced endothelium-independent dilation (EID), brachial and carotid artery distension, distensibility and compliance, and carotid artery intima-media thickness (cIMT).
Both carvedilol and metoprolol treatment resulted in significant and similar decreases in systolic (P < .05) and diastolic (P < .0001) blood pressure. Compared with metoprolol, carvedilol significantly improved FMD (P < .001). No differences between groups were noted for any of the glycemic or lipid variables except for HDL cholesterol, which significantly decreased (P < .05) in the metoprolol group compared with the carvedilol group. No differences were observed between groups for CRP, the markers of oxidative stress, EID, arterial stiffness, or cIMT.
Compared with metoprolol, carvedilol significantly improves endothelial function in patients with T2DM. Changes in glycemic control and oxidative stress do not seem to explain the observed improvements in FMD, which suggests that other mechanisms may be involved.
数据表明卡维地洛具有抗氧化特性,可能提供血管保护作用。我们试图在一项直接比较试验中对比卡维地洛和酒石酸美托洛尔对内皮功能和氧化应激的影响。
34例2型糖尿病(T2DM)合并高血压患者在继续服用当前抗高血压药物的基础上,随机分为接受卡维地洛治疗组(n = 16)或酒石酸美托洛尔治疗组(n = 18),治疗5个月。在治疗前后测量以下变量:血压、空腹血糖和胰岛素、采用稳态模型评估的胰岛素抵抗、糖化血红蛋白、血脂、C反应蛋白(CRP)、8-异前列腺素、不对称二甲基精氨酸、氧化型低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、通过超声评估肱动脉血流介导的舒张功能(FMD)、硝酸甘油诱导的非内皮依赖性舒张功能(EID)、肱动脉和颈动脉扩张、扩张性和顺应性以及颈动脉内膜中层厚度(cIMT)。
卡维地洛和酒石酸美托洛尔治疗均导致收缩压(P < .05)和舒张压(P < .0001)显著且相似地降低。与酒石酸美托洛尔相比,卡维地洛显著改善了FMD(P < .001)。除高密度脂蛋白胆固醇外,两组在任何血糖或血脂变量上均未观察到差异,与卡维地洛组相比,酒石酸美托洛尔组高密度脂蛋白胆固醇显著降低(P < .05)。两组在CRP、氧化应激标志物、EID、动脉僵硬度或cIMT方面未观察到差异。
与酒石酸美托洛尔相比,卡维地洛显著改善了T2DM患者的内皮功能。血糖控制和氧化应激的变化似乎无法解释观察到的FMD改善情况,这表明可能涉及其他机制。